Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 300039
Title CO2 uptake by a stand of Douglas fir: flux measurements compared with model calculations
Author(s) Vermetten, A.W.M.; Ganzeveld, L.; Jeuken, A.; Hofschreuder, P.; Mohren, G.M.J.
Source Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 72 (1994)1-2. - ISSN 0168-1923 - p. 57 - 80.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(94)90091-4
Department(s) Institute for Forestry and Nature Research
Air Quality
WIMEK
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 1994
Abstract Fluxes of CO2 were calculated by the gradient method from concentration differences, measured in the surface roughness layer above a Douglas fir stand in the Netherlands during a full year (1989). The annual course of the CO2 flux density clearly showed the influence of temperature and incoming radiation on stand assimilation. Monthly mean fluxes were directed towards the stand throughout the year and ranged from 40 kg CO2 ha-1 day-1 in winter to 220 kg CO2 ha-1 day-1 in summer. Results for 1989 were compared with CO2 uptake by the stand, as estimated by a forest growth model, after correction for the soil respiration flux calculated by the model. For the summer months the simulated CO2 uptake agreed with the measurements within the range of uncertainty. During winter-time, however, the model predicted a net loss of CO2 to the atmosphere, whereas the measurements still indicated uptake of CO2 by the ecosystem, in spite of the lower temperature and radiation levels. The difference in the winter months may partially be explained by the uncertainty in the annual course of the soil respiration flux estimated by the model. More probably, however, advection from adjacent deciduous stands and the use of the gradient method beyond its theoretical restraints, may have led to large systematic errors in the fluxes during winter-time.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.