Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 308386
Title Evaluation of a PCR kit for the detection of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica on potato tubers
Author(s) Frechon, D.; Exbrayat, P.; Helias, V.; Hyman, L.J.; Jouan, B.; Llop, P.; Lopez, M.M.; Payet, N.; Perombelon, M.C.M.; Toth, I.K.; Beckhoven, J.R.C.M. van; Wolf, J.M. van der; Bertheau, Y.
Source Potato Research 41 (1998)2. - ISSN 0014-3065 - p. 163 - 173.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02358439
Department(s) Research Institute for Plant Protection
Plant Research International
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 1998
Abstract A PCR-based kit, Probelia(TM), for the detection of Erwinia carotovora subsp. atroseptica (Eca) on potatoes was evaluated at five laboratories in four countries. The kit is based on DNA-specific PCR amplification followed by detection of amplicons by hybridization to a peroxidase-labelled DNA probe in a microplate. Specificity of the PCR primers for Eca, regardless of serogroups, was confirmed by testing against 246 bacterial, fungal and plant species. Detection limits of the assay varied little between six Eca strains in pure cultures (1.3x102 to 1.5x103 cells ml-1). When Eca-free tuber peel extract from four cultivars was inoculated with known numbers of 15 Eca strains, detection limits were more variable (1.0x101 to 6.2x103 cells ml-1 peel extract), attributed probably to inconsistency in the recovery of DNA during extraction. When the PCR assay was compared with three current commercial Eca detection methods, using naturally contaminated tubers, results matched most closely those from viable counts on a selective medium, the most sensitive method (88%), followed by enrichment ELISA (72%) and last ELISA (30%), the least sensitive method.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.