Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 363001
Title De Darfur-Darfur dialoog en consultatie: laatste strohalm voor het vredesakkoord?
Author(s) Grieken, D. van; Frerks, G.E.; Woud, R. van der
Source Internationale Spectator 61 (2007)5. - ISSN 0020-9317 - p. 252 - 256.
Department(s) Chair Disaster Studies
CERES
Publication type Non-refereed article in scientific journal
Publication year 2007
Abstract Daniëlle van Grieken, Georg Frerks and Riek van der Woud throw light on the chances rather than the risks of the Darfur-Darfur Dialogue & Consultation process as a last resort to promote the implementation of the Darfur Peace Agreement. The current context in Darfur requires a distinctive approach by international donors, aimed at finding a political solution to Darfur's continuous crisis. International donors and analysts have demonstrated their support for two distinct strategies; either employing a basket of coercive measures to persuade or force the Sudanese Government into changing its destructive policy or applying a cooperative strategy by restarting the political process and reviving the May 2006 Darfur Peace Agreement (DPA). Although both strategies may be beneficial if well applied, this paper urges the international community not to apply both strategies simultaneously. Ideally, international donors should establish an effective international division of labour, with each government or organisation making a pragmatic choice for one of the strategies based on its expertise, power and possibilities, to achieve maximum efficiency, clarity on donor roles and constructive results as a whole. Restarting the political process and saving the DPA should be high on the international agenda. International support for the Darfur-Darfur Dialogue and Consultation (DDDC) will be influential in this respect as this public and all-inclusive process of sustained dialogue forms an opportunity to broaden the base of support for the DPA among Darfur's diverse populations and may eventually even induce non-signatories within the current DPA+ talks, to sign the Agreement after all. If one recognizes the DDDC's potential for Darfur's peace process as a whole, it becomes critical that international donors soon provide practical and political support to start the DDDC in Darfur where security conditions permit. Although support for the DDDC forms a less considered donor strategy in Darfur, it may be the last resort to find a solution to Darfur's crisis within the framework of the DPA.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.