Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 370675
Title Odor and irritation thresholds for ammonia: A comparison between static and dynamic olfactometry
Author(s) Smeets, M.A.M.; Bulsing, P.J.; Rooden, S. van; Steinmann, R.; Ru, J.A. de; Ogink, N.W.M.; Thriel, C. van; Dalton, P.H.
Source Chemical Senses 32 (2007)1. - ISSN 0379-864X - p. 11 - 20.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjl031
Department(s) AFSG Food Quality
Livestock Research
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2007
Keyword(s) occupational-exposure limits - temporal integration - allergic rhinitis - sensitivity - chemicals - air - performance - irritants - workers - humans
Abstract Odor and lateralization (irritation) thresholds (LTs) for ammonia vapor were measured using static and dynamic olfactometry. The purpose of the study was to explore the test-retest reliability and comparability of dynamic olfactometry methodology, generally used to determine odor thresholds following European Committee for Standardization guidelines in the context of odor regulations to outside emissions, with static olfactometry. Within a 2-week period, odor and LTs for ammonia were obtained twice for each method for 24 females. No significant differences between methods were found: mean odor detection thresholds (ODTs) were 2.6 parts per million (ppm) for either method (P = 0.96), and mean LTs were 31.7 and 60.9 ppm for the static and dynamic method, respectively (P = 0.07). Test-retest reliability was higher for the dynamic than for the static method (r = 0.61 vs. 0.14 for ODTs and r = 0.86 vs. 0.45 for LTs). The choice of optimal method for any application, however, depends not only on psychometric factors but also on practical factors such as physicochemical properties of the compound, availability of equipment and expertise, task efficiency, and costs.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.