Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 399684
Title Jumping across scales and levels. The role and functioning of scale framing in different interaction settings in the context of a complex decision making process
Author(s) Lieshout, M. van; Dewulf, A.; Aarts, M.N.C.; Termeer, C.J.A.M.
Event 5th International Conference in Interpretive Policy Analysis, Grenoble, France, 2010-06-23/2010-06-25
Department(s) Public Administration and Policy
Communication Science
WASS
Publication type Abstract in scientific journal or proceedings
Publication year 2010
Abstract In this paper we draw on interactional theories about frames and framing to analyze how actors use scale frames in different interactional settings. What is the function of scale frames in interactions? How are scales used in interaction to enforce responsibility, to in- and exclude actors and ideas? The framing of a problem is the result of interactions between different actors. Out of the various frames people may construct in interaction we analyze scale frames, since these provide for many arguments. Different (scale) frames make it possible for both supporters and opponents to use the same facts to either confirm or reject advantages and disadvantages. Our study shows that scale frames are used to shift responsibilities, to justify disputable decisions, to in- and exclude arguments and to create credibility. Actors take their conversation partners into account and adjust their scale frames to construct credible arguments in particular contexts. Direct interaction, makes it possible to downscale the opponents argument to a lower and less problematic level or reversely, to upscale the argument to a more problematic level.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.