Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 400254
Title Evaluating choices in multi-process landscape evolution models
Author(s) Temme, A.J.A.M.; Claessens, L.; Veldkamp, A.; Schoorl, J.M.
Source Geomorphology 125 (2011)2. - ISSN 0169-555X - p. 271 - 281.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.10.007
Department(s) Land Dynamics
Landscape Centre
PE&RC
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2011
Keyword(s) rudimentary mechanistic model - digital elevation models - land-use change - soil redistribution - new-zealand - catchment geomorphology - temporal scales - cellular-model - dem resolution - erosion
Abstract The interest in landscape evolution models (LEMs) that simulate multiple landscape processes is growing. However, modelling multiple processes constitutes a new starting point for which some aspects of the set up of LEMs must be re-evaluated. The objective of this paper is to demonstrate the practical significance of, and possibilities for such re-evaluation. We first discuss which simplifications must be made to set up LEMs. Then, simplifications of particular interest to the modelling of multiple processes are identified. Finally, case studies from New Zealand, Belgium and Croatia explore the performance of different model versions under several common choices for model and data simplifications. In these case studies we illustrate methods to make the choices, typically by i) comparing the results of different model versions, ii) assessing model validity or iii) indicating the sensitivity of models for different simplifications. The results indicate that LEM performance is strongly dependent on multi-process related choices, and that performance indicators can be used for ex-post testing of the influence of these choices. In particular, we demonstrate the significance of simplifications regarding the number of processes, presence of sinks and temporal resolution.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.