Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 407227
Title Prognostic value of the Rose questionnaire: a validation with future coronary events in the SMART study
Author(s) Achterberg, S.; Soedamah-Muthu, S.S.; Cramer, M.J.M.; Kappelle, L.J.; Graaf, Y. van der; Algra, A.
Source European Journal of Preventive Cardiology 19 (2012)1. - ISSN 2047-4873 - p. 5 - 14.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1741826710391117
Department(s) Chair Nutrition and Disease
VLAG
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2012
Keyword(s) angina-pectoris - heart-disease - follow-up - general-population - chest-pain - men - mortality - women - risk - prevalence
Abstract Aim: The Rose questionnaire was developed in epidemiological studies to obtain a reproducible diagnosis of angina pectoris. We studied the prognostic value of this questionnaire with respect to the occurrence of future coronary events. Methods and results: We studied 7916 consecutive patients (mean age 56 years; 67% men) with clinically manifest vascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors, enrolled in the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) study from 1996 to 2009. At inclusion, all patients completed the Rose questionnaire. We investigated the prognostic value of four definitions of angina pectoris that were based on the following elements of the questionnaire (1) the full questionnaire; (2) three key questions concerning chest pain; (3) one question about discomfort or pain in the chest; (4) two questions about complaints when slowing down or stopping activities (the definition that is used in the SMART study). All patients were followed for new coronary events and interventions for an average of 4.6 years. Analyses were with multivariable Cox regression models. Discriminatory ability of the four definitions as assessed with areas under the receiver-operator characteristics curves was similar (range 0.708–0.726) for coronary events in isolation as well as in combination with coronary interventions. The models were assessed for their ability to improve risk stratification compared with each other; differences between definitions are small. Conclusion: Our data implicate that the use of a subset of questions of the Rose questionnaire performs equally well compared with the full Rose questionnaire regarding the prediction of coronary events.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.