Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
Record number 40742
Title Calibration of soil heat flux sensors.
Author(s) Loon, W.K.P. van; Bastings, H.M.H.; Moors, E.J.
Source Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 29 (1998). - ISSN 0168-1923 - p. 1 - 8.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1923(98)00090-2
Department(s) Agricultural Engineering and Physics
Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil and Water Research
PE&RC
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 1998
Keyword(s) meting - bodemtemperatuur - thermische geleiding - kalibratie - sensors - thermische bodemeigenschappen - measurement - soil temperature - thermal conductivity - calibration - soil thermal properties
Categories Soil Physics
Abstract Soil heat flux is difficult to measure accurately and soil heat flux plates are difficult to calibrate. In this research the reference heat flux was calculated from the temperature gradient and independent thermal conductivity measurements. Reference conductivities, as measured by the non-steady state probe method, have an error of about 2%, while the temperature gradient was measured to an accuracy better than 1%. This results in very reliable reference measurements. Compared with this reference, commercially available heat flux plates have significant inaccuracies. The 1 mm thin TNO PU 43 T sensor was the most accurate with an average relative error of only 4%. A promising new technique is the in situ self calibration, as performed by the Huksefluks HFP-01-SC disc sensor. With self calibration this sensor achieves an accuracy of 5% and confers several advantages for field use. The MIDDLETON CN3 and TNO WS 31S sensors had relative errors of about 20%. The ring shaped sensor Huksefluks SH1 gave relatively poor results, because it measured, in fact, the temperature gradient instead of the heat flux. The results of this sensor remained poor after correcting for the thermal conductivity of the sand. For all sensors the same conclusions hold for non-steady state conditions with evaporation. The often used Philip (1961) correction factor is shown to be not very accurate: in only half of our experiments its use decreased the relative measuring error; and in some cases it made it worse. However, the correction remains useful as a tool for designing soil heat flux sensors; also a positive relation exists between the magnitude of the correction and the inaccuracy of the measurement.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.