Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 419122
Title Doing frogs and the elephants: Or how atypical moving bodies are affected by predominantly able-bodies
Author(s) Mogendorff, K.G.
Source Medische Antropologie 22 (2010)2. - ISSN 0925-4374 - p. 321 - 337.
Department(s) Methodical Ethics and Technology Assessment
Communication Science
WASS
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2010
Abstract With help of the Deleuzian moving body concept this paper seeks to further insight intohow bodies with a different kinesiology are affected by and affect other bodies. Based on ¿eldwork among ¿fteen, congenital neuromotor impaired young adults and the lifelongexperience of the author with a movement disorder. I ¿rst discuss how expectations of people and in particular the body-images of disabled people are affected by our constant enmeshment with other bodies. Secondly, two basic bodily practices which informantshave learned in paediatric physiotherapy – the frog and the elephant – are described to introduce the different body kinesiology of neuromotor impaired people. Thirdly, it isshown how the different bodily practices of informants affect encounters with able-bodied people. The focus is on how the ambiguity of the visibility of movement disorders disruptsencounters. This is followed by a description of how informants try to avoid or resolvedisruptions in encounters. In the ¿nal section the author compares the employed embodied perspective to social political models of disability.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.