Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 428841
Title Genomic selection for dry matter intake using a combined European and Australian reference population
Author(s) Haas, Y. de; Pryce, J.; Calus, M.P.L.; Wall, E.; Coffey, M.P.; Daetwyler, H.D.; Hayes, B.J.; Veerkamp, R.F.
Event Breeding and Genetics Beef Cattle Breeding II - Applied genomics, Phoenix Arizona US, 2012-07-15/2012-07-19
Department(s) LR - Backoffice
Animal Breeding and Genetics
LR - Animal Breeding & Genomics
WIAS
Publication type Contribution in proceedings
Publication year 2012
Abstract Dairy cow dry matter intake (DMI) data from Australia (AU), the United Kingdom (UK) and the Netherlands (NL) were combined (1801 cows) for this study. The aim was to explore the impact on the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values of pooling data across key reference populations. A total of 843 Australian growing heifers with records on DMI measured over 60 to 70 d at approximately 200 d of age, 359 Scottish and 599 Dutch lactating heifers with records on DMI during the first 100 d in milk were included in the data set. Genotypes were obtained using the Illumina BovineSNP50 BeadChip for European (UK+NL) cows, and Illumina High Density Bovine SNP chip for AU heifers. The AU and EU genomic data were matched on SNP-name and genotypes were compared for quality control using 40 bulls that were genotyped in both data sets. This resulted in a total of 30,949 SNPs being used in the analyses. Genomic predictions were with both single-trait and multi-trait genomic REML models, using ASReml. The accuracy of genomic prediction was evaluated in 11 single-country validation sets, and the reference set (where animals had both DMI phenotypes and genotypes) were either a reference set within AU or EU, or with a multi-country reference set consisting of all data except the validation set. When DMI was considered to be the same trait for each country, using a multi-country reference set, the accuracy of genomic prediction for DMI increased for EU and UK, but not for AU and NL. Extending to a bivariate (AU-EU) or trivariate (AU-UK-NL) model increased the accuracy of genomic prediction for DMI in all countries. The highest accuracies were estimated for all countries when data was analyzed with a trivariate model, with increases of up to 5.5% compared with a single-trait analysis with a multi-country reference set.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.