Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 430640
Title Trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards: Current debates on the breadth of REDD+.
Author(s) Visseren-Hamakers, I.J.; McDermott, C.; Vijge, M.J.; Cashore, B.
Source Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 4 (2012)6. - ISSN 1877-3435 - p. 646 - 653.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2012.10.005
Department(s) Forest and Nature Conservation Policy
Environmental Policy
WASS
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2012
Keyword(s) climate-change - forest degradation - reduced emissions - carbon payments - biodiversity - deforestation - plus - opportunities - conservation - management
Abstract Fundamental trade-offs exist between different land uses for carbon, livelihoods, economic development, biodiversity, agriculture and energy (especially biofuels). This article analyses the scientific debates on REDD+ trade-offs, co-benefits and safeguards, and shows how the development and expanded scope of REDD+ mechanisms have shaped these debates over time. We find substantial evidence that the non-carbon values of biodiversity conservation, equity and sustainable livelihoods are critical to both the legitimacy and effectiveness of REDD+, and argue that they therefore are better viewed as prerequisites than as values to be safeguarded. Scientists can contribute to the development of a more integrative REDD+ through interdisciplinary research and through a ‘learning architecture’ that supports the REDD+ policy development process with research dedicated to finding durable solutions.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.