Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 433389
Title Guidelines for the validation of qualitative multi-residue methods used to detect pesticides in food
Author(s) Mol, J.G.J.; Reynolds, S.L.; Fussell, R.J.; Stajnbaher, D.
Source Drug Testing and Analysis 4 (2012)Supplement S1. - ISSN 1942-7603 - p. 10 - 16.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.1364
Department(s) RIKILT - Analyse & Ontwikkeling
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2012
Keyword(s) mass-spectrometric detection - gas-chromatography - liquid-chromatography - vegetables - fruits
Abstract There is a current trend for many laboratories to develop and use qualitative gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based multi-residue methods (MRMs) in order to greatly increase the number of pesticides that they can target. Before these qualitative MRMs can be used for the monitoring of pesticide residues in food, their fitness-for-purpose needs to be established by initial method validation. This paper sets out to assess the performances of two such qualitative MRMs against a set of parameters and criteria that might be suitable for their effective validation. As expected, the ease of detection was often dependent on the particular pesticide/commodity combinations that were targeted, especially at the lowest concentrations tested (0.01¿mg/kg). The two examples also clearly demonstrated that the percentage of pesticides detected was dependent on many factors, but particularly on the capabilities of the automated software/library packages and the parameters and threshold settings selected for operation. Another very important consideration was the condition of chromatographic system and detector at the time of analysis. If the system was relatively clean, then the detection rate was much higher than if it had become contaminated over time from previous injections of sample extracts. The parameters and criteria suggested for method validation of qualitative MRMs are aimed at achieving a 95% confidence level of pesticide detection. However, the presence of any pesticide that is ‘detected’ will need subsequent analysis for quantification and, depending on the qualitative method used, further evidence of identity.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.