Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 433873
Title Robust agriculture: Balancing between vulnerability and stability
Author(s) Goede, D.M. de; Gremmen, B.; Blom, M.
Source NJAS Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 64-65 (2013). - ISSN 1573-5214 - p. 1 - 7.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2012.03.001
Department(s) Methodical Ethics and Technology Assessment
Applied Philosophy Group
PPO/PRI AGRO Water- en Biobased Economy
WASS
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2013
Keyword(s) highly optimized tolerance - ecological resilience - parameter design - systems - complexity - framework - sustainability - adaptability - perspective - ecosystems
Abstract The impression that agricultural systems are increasingly vulnerable to unwanted environmental fluctuations has created an urge for robustness in agriculture. However, the meaning of robustness and its relation to sustainable agriculture remain unclear. Considering two related concepts, i.e., vulnerability and stability, this article analyses different conceptualizations of robustness and their applications in agricultural production systems. It is argued that robustness should not be seen as a clear-cut system feature, and that it only exists in the absence of stability and by the grace of disruptions that could possibly harm the system structurally or functionally. The article introduces the term robustness state to refer to an intermediate sphere between vulnerable and stable, in which a system's capacity to cope with both ordinary and occasional disturbances is optimized. We distinguish three robustness states that differ in the degree by which systems are allowed or inclined to follow environmental changes: (1) a state of avoiding exposure, (2) a state of inherent resistance, and (3) a state of response and recovery after being disrupted. In addition to cardinal questions inevitably related to robustness, namely the specification of both system and perturbation, this article discusses the issue in what way a system feature is robust. This issue may help to clarify the actual meaning given to robustness and appears particularly relevant when discussing the desirability of different strategies to cope with aspects of vulnerability. Different rationales behind recent calls to make agricultural systems more robust are discussed with a view to agricultural developments related to sustainability of agricultural practices and the questioned necessity of external control measures.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.