Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 434828
Title Consolidating the shared area of investigation between planning theory, risk theory and ethical inquiry
Author(s) Basta, C.
Event AESOP 2012, 26th Annual Congress, 2012-07-11/2012-07-15
Department(s) Land Use Planning
WASS
Publication type Contribution in proceedings
Publication year 2012
Abstract Although it is perhaps the most prominent interdisciplinary theme to have emerged in the past decades, in the domain of planning studies the prevention of technological risks has only recently started the pathway towards a rigorous theoretical definition (Boholm and Lofsted 2004; Hayden Lesbirel and Shaw 2005; Schmidt-Thomé 2006). This article is a further contribution and tries to delimit the shared area of investigation among risk theories, planning theories and ethical inquiry. In particular it discusses the matter of accounting technological risk, and its counterpart safety, as an explicit spatial design factor; this, not only in relation to the immediate context of risk-bearing installations but rather in relation to the overall distribution of risks in society. This latter consideration relates to the inherently normative nature of the practice of risk prevention, whose moral implications cannot be limited to the site-specific context of hazards; it is in fact the overall risk distribution in society, taking place through planning instruments, that needs to be considered. This article is part of a series of writings that aim at promoting a debate on what theoretical perspectives different disciplinary domains can contribute with in order to elaborate a solid and consistent planning discourse on technological risks. As such it constitutes a contribution to the streams of research of the referenced sociology, planning, risk and ethics scholars.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.