Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 443771
Title Power politics in the revision of China’s Environmental Protection Law
Author(s) Zhang, L.; He, G.; Mol, A.P.J.; Zhu, X.
Source Environmental Politics 22 (2013)6. - ISSN 0964-4016 - p. 1029 - 1035.
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.843866
Department(s) Environmental Policy
WASS
WIMEK
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2013
Abstract Environmental law making, like other legislative processes in China, used to take place behind closed doors. A major innovation in recent years is that it is now normal to consult the public on draft laws, although it is not yet prescribed in the Law on Legislation. It is tempting to interpret the delayed approval of the EPL revision as a double victory: an environmentally unfriendly draft was blocked, and public debate (rather than closed-door secrecy) was a main factor strengthening environmental interests. Three lessons can be drawn from this case of (high) environmental politics in contemporary China. First, notwithstanding all the environmental rhetoric in the 12th Five-Year Plan (2011–2015) and the new 2012 constitution of the Communist Party, powerful individuals and organisations in the administration can still impede the building and strengthening of environmental institutions. Greening China is far from an evolutionary process (Mol and Carter 2006). Second, the controversies and political debates around environmental institution building and reform are increasingly moving into the public sphere, which makes it harder for them to be neglected by China's leaders. Whilst ‘authoritarian environmentalism’ (Gilley 2012) does not belong to the past, the institutional landscape of environmental politics is definitely changing and relocating. Third, the wider public and environmental NGOs still play a marginal and indirect role in these more open political debates compared to the party and state organs and scientific experts. But the growing environmental awareness and activism of civil society make Chinese leaders conscious of the significance of their environmental performance in sustaining overall trust and legitimacy (He et al. 2012)
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.