Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 505962
Title Comparing LES, Lab and Empirical Representations of a Neutral Flow over Canopy
Author(s) Ouwersloot, Huug; Moene, A.F.; Attema, Jisk; Vilà-Guerau De Arellano, J.
Event 22th Symposium on Boundary Layers and Turbulence, Salt Lake City , 2016-06-22/2016-06-24
Department(s) Meteorology and Air Quality
Publication type Abstract in scientific journal or proceedings
Publication year 2016
Abstract Atmospheric flows over vegetation canopy are frequently investigated using widely varying methods, but the similarity between the different representations is tested to a lesser degree. Here, we will present a comparison between the representations of a neutral atmospheric flow over vegetation canopy by two large-eddy simulation models, wind tunnel data and recently updated empirical flux-gradient relationships. A neutral case was selected for the highest anticipated differences, due to the absence of production or destruction of turbulence by buoyancy.
Special attention is devoted to the dynamics in the roughness sublayer above the canopy layer, where turbulence is strongest. We demonstrate that the flow properties are generally consistent between the different datasets and models, thus bolstering confidence in the individual independent representations. We can explain the remaining differences by treating the divergent assumptions that are applied.

Systematic sensitivity analyses with the Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation model further demonstrate that the statistics of the resulting atmospheric flow, normalized by the friction velocity, are independent of the background wind velocity if, but only if, the evaluated points in time are scaled inversely proportional with that velocity. Another aspect is related to the one-sided plant-area density distribution (PAD). The PAD is shown to affect the numerically resolved flow not only through its general configuration, but through the transition from canopy to unobstructed air as well. Sharp transitions can induce anomalous spatial fluctuations in the wind velocity statistics, which can be fully suppressed by spreading the transition over four steps. Finer vertical resolutions only serve to reduce the magnitude of these fluctuations, but do not prevent them. To capture the general dynamics of the flow, a resolution of 10 % of the canopy height is found to suffice, while a finer resolution still improves the representation of the TKE. However, if only the vertical resolution is increased, keeping the original resolution in the horizontal directions, the representation of the turbulence flow does not improve.

To complete the evaluation, quadrant analyses, based on wind velocity, are performed on the simulation data. A major finding is that momentum transport is dominated by the mean velocity components within each quadrant. As a result, one can satisfactorily estimate the total vertical turbulent momentum flux without considering the fluctuations in the wind components within those quadrants.
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.