Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 507674
Title In situ investigation of the effects of current velocity on sedimentary mussel bed stability
Author(s) Kangeri, A.K.; Jansen, Jeroen M.; Joppe, D.J.; Dankers, N.M.J.A.
Source Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 485 (2016). - ISSN 0022-0981 - p. 65 - 72.
Department(s) Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management
IMARES Onderzoeksformatie
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2016
Keyword(s) Mussel - Annular flume - Adhesion - Sediment - Erosion - Hydrodynamics
Abstract The intertidal sediments of theWadden Sea is an environmentwhere organismsmust endure significant physical stresses. Organisms like the bluemussel (Mytilus edulis), face the difficulty of maintaining their position in an unstable substrate. Previous studies on mussel beds in sediment showed that the substrates mussels use for attachment can differ across a bed. Increased adhesion to shell debris in the sediment resulted in what appeared to be a
reinforced bed edge. To quantify the erosion resilience in different substrate use zones of an intertidalmussel bed, three distinct zones in a mussel bed were exposed, in situ, to artificially generated current velocities. Velocities ranged from high (0.7m s−1) to very high (1.43 m s−1), covering the upper extremes of current velocities measured on mussel beds and those well beyond normal conditions. Silt content of the sediment was decreased 20% towards the bed edge. Results showed that the resilience of the mussel bed to erosion differed significantly between zones. The zone along the bed edge showed the greatest resilience to erosion remaining intact at current velocities of 1.43ms−1. This was also the zone with the greatest mussel cover (90%) and highest density. Erosion
resiliencewas lower in the zones closer to the bed center. Erosion of musselswas always precluded by erosion of the sediment underlying the mussel bed (undercutting). In the zone with an intermediate mussel cover (77%), undercutting already occurred at a current velocity of 0.7 m s−1 and was twice as pronounced as in the site with the lowest mussel cover (53%). In all zones, mussel dislodgement did not occur below current velocities of 1.16m s−1. In zones towards the bed center, complete erosion of the bed occurred at 1.43ms−1. Results suggest that a 10% lowermussel coverage increased undercutting by 50%. The reinforcedwaveward bed edge proved to be capable of resisting erosive forces likely only exceeded during extreme storms. The presence of such a resilient barrier shields the rest of the bed fromerosion allowing mussels in the sheltered zones to invest fewer resources in adhesion. Results show the significance of mussel coverage and adhesion on bed resilience. Any predictive modeling or artificial restoration efforts should account for and facilitate the development of such bed edges to improve a beds chance of survival.
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.