Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 509547
Title Explaining rice yields and yield gaps in Central Luzon, Philippines : An application of stochastic frontier analysis and crop modelling
Author(s) Nunes Vieira da Silva, Joao; Reidsma, Pytrik; Laborte, Alice G.; Ittersum, Martin K. Van
Source European Journal of Agronomy 82 (2017). - ISSN 1161-0301 - p. 223 - 241.
Department(s) Plant Production Systems
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2017
Abstract Explaining yield gaps is crucial to understand the main technical constraints faced by farmers to increaseland productivity. The objective of this study is to decompose the yield gap into efficiency, resource andtechnology yield gaps for irrigated lowland rice-based farming systems in Central Luzon, Philippines, andto explain those yield gaps using data related to crop management, biophysical constraints and availabletechnologies.Stochastic frontier analysis was used to quantify and explain the efficiency and resource yield gaps anda crop growth model (ORYZA v3) was used to compute the technology yield gap. We combined these twomethodologies into a theoretical framework to explain rice yield gaps in farmers’ fields included in theCentral Luzon Loop Survey, an unbalanced panel dataset of about 100 households, collected every fourto five years during the period 1966–2012.The mean yield gap estimated for the period 1979–2012 was 3.2 ton ha−1in the wet season (WS)and 4.8 ton ha−1in the dry season (DS). An average efficiency yield gap of 1.3 ton ha−1was estimatedand partly explained by untimely application of mineral fertilizers and biotic control factors. The meanresource yield gap was small in both seasons but somewhat larger in the DS (1.3 ton ha−1) than in theWS (1.0 ton ha−1). This can be partly explained by the greater N, P and K use in the highest yielding fieldsthan in lowest yielding fields which was observed in the DS but not in the WS. The technology yield gapwas on average less than 1.0 ton ha−1during the WS prior to 2003 and ca. 1.6 ton ha−1from 2003 to 2012while in the DS it has been consistently large with a mean of 2.2 ton ha−1. Varietal shift and sub-optimalapplication of inputs (e.g. quantity of irrigation water and N) are the most plausible explanations for thisyield gap during the WS and DS, respectively.We conclude that the technology yield gap explains nearly half of the difference between potentialand actual yields while the efficiency and resource yield gaps explain each a quarter of that differencein the DS. As for the WS, particular attention should be given to the efficiency yield gap which, althoughdecreasing with time, still accounted for nearly 40% of the overall yield gap.
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.