Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 531924
Title How employees perceive organizational learning: construct validation of the 25-item short form of the strategic learning assessment map (SF-SLAM)
Author(s) Mainert, Jakob; Niepel, Christoph; Lans, T.; Greiff, Samuel
Source Journal of Knowledge Management 22 (2018)1. - ISSN 1367-3270 - p. 57 - 75.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0494
Department(s) WASS
Education and Competence Studies
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2018
Abstract Purpose: The Strategic Learning Assessment Map (SLAM) originally assessed organizational learning (OL) at the level of the firm by addressing managers, who rated OL in the SLAM on five dimensions of individual learning, group learning, organizational learning, feed-forward learning, and feedback learning. However, as employees are getting their jobs done discretely and are increasingly making their own decisions, their perspective on OL genuinely matters. Hence, we assessed OL at the level of the individual by addressing employees on all levels, who rated OL in a short form of the SLAM (SF-SLAM). Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, we focused on the construct validity of this SF-SLAM by investigated its reliability, factorial validity, and nomological network. First, we asked whether the SF-SLAM reliably measures OL on five dimensions of individual, group, organizational, feed-forward, and feedback learning. Next, we asked whether the SF-SLAM was associated with its nomological network of engaging in innovation-related learning activities, behaving innovatively on the job, and showing higher educational levels, intelligence, and individual job performances. We used a diverse German employee sample of skilled and unskilled workers and managers (N = 434) and analyzed the data with structural equation modeling. Findings: The SF-SLAM was reliable, but revealed both constrained factorial validity and validity on the basis of its nomological network. First, five dimensions found support in our employee sample, but their correlations were high or very high, except for individual learning. Second, the SF-SLAM showed only few differential relations with variables from its nomological network. Originality/value: Taken together, the SF-SLAM is short, reliable, and only valid for examining individual learning.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.