Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 533806
Title Theorizing Change - Mapping Stakeholders’ Perspectives. on the Ecosystem Services Project in Huamantanga, Peru
Author(s) Cieslik, Katarzyna; Dewulf, A.R.P.J.
Event Resilience Frontiers for Global Sustainability, Stockholm, 2017-08-20/2017-08-22
Department(s) WASS
Knowledge Technology and Innovation
Public Administration and Policy
Publication type Contribution in proceedings
Publication year 2017
Abstract Social programs are based on explicit or implicit assumptions of how and why a certain intervention will work. Recently, these assumptions have captured the attention of academics and practitioners alike, sparking sudden interest in the so called theories of change (ToCh). By illustrating how each intermediate outcome links to another in a logical and/or chronological flow, ToCh are explanations of how certain groups of stakeholders expect to reach a commonly understood long-term goal. In this research, we take the comprehensive case study of a recent ecosystem services project in Huamantanga, Peru, as a strategic site to illustrate the diversity of perceptions and assumptions around the project’s theory (ies) of change held by a heterogeneous group of stakeholders. Founded by the British research consortium, Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA), the intervention built upon launching a community-led environmental virtual observatory (EVO): an open technology platform for ecosystem knowledge generation and exchange. While in principle, ToCh represents a welcome effort of organizations to explore and represent change in a way that reflects a systemic understanding of development, practitioners’ experience points to the threats of its unquestioned application. External application of ToChs imposes a pre-defined project logic model and irrevocably reduces complex social reality to a clear-cut range of project deliverables. The pressure to be policy-relevant and to deliver a range of specific impacts, while well-intentioned, may also deter investigation of alternative sets of assumptions about the change process. With the use of ethnographic data, narrative interviews and focus group discussions with the project's stakeholders (Huamantanga community members, the researchers, practitioners and founders), we attempt to explore these ‘alternative assumptions’, conceptualizing ToCh not as a product, but as an ongoing process of reflection and dialogue, a path of practice-informed scientific exploration.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.