Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 535814
Title Exergetic comparison of three different processing routes for yellow pea (Pisum sativum) : Functionality as a driver in sustainable process design
Author(s) Geerts, Marlies; Veghel, Amber van; Zisopoulos, Filippos K.; Padt, Albert van der; Goot, Atze Jan van der
Source Journal of Cleaner Production 183 (2018). - ISSN 0959-6526 - p. 979 - 987.
Department(s) Food Process Engineering
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2018
Keyword(s) Exergy analysis - Functionality - Mild fractionation - Yellow pea
Abstract Today, the environmental performance of food products and food ingredients is mostly evaluated on the basis of mass (MJ/kg). However, food ingredients are generally added to obtain a specific functionality, such as increased viscosity or modification of the texture. The functionality obtained is not always fully correlated with the amount of ingredients added. This can be especially true when ingredients are produced using different processes. We have investigated how the functionality of ingredients can be included in a sustainability analysis. Here, we have combined exergy analysis and functionality to select the most beneficial process route for fractionation of yellow pea flour. We assess the resource use efficiency of three fractionation processes for yellow pea flour: conventional wet fractionation (CWF), dry fractionation (DF), and a mild wet fractionation (MWF). Exergy analysis based on mass showed that DF has the highest exergy efficiency (99%), due to the (almost) complete use of raw materials, followed by the MWF (54%) and CWF (35%). Interestingly, even though DF is identified as the preferred technology on exergy analysis based on mass, DF is not the preferred option when the results are expressed as MJ/functionality. In that case, more DF starch is needed to obtain the desired functionality, resulting in higher exergy consumption for DF. This study shows that mass-based exergy analysis could result in an exergy efficient process route, whereas for functional application in a food product, this process route is not always the most efficient with regard to resource. This outcome demonstrates the need for inclusion of functionality in sustainability analysis.
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.