Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 541462
Title Unravelling the relative roles of physical processes in modelling the life cycle of a warm radiation fog
Author(s) Steeneveld, G.J.; Bode, M. de
Source Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society (2018). - ISSN 0035-9009
DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3300
Department(s) Meteorology and Air Quality
WIMEK
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2018
Abstract This study evaluates the representation of the life cycle of a radiation fog case study observed at the Cabauw 213‐m tower (Netherlands) facility by the WRF single‐column model, and aims to advance the understanding of the model behaviour, which will assist to set research priorities for the future. First an ensemble of sixteen WRF configurations that vary in parameterization schemes for the PBL, land surface, longwave radiation, and microphysics are evaluated. Next, we perform a sensitivity study to examine which physical process is most crucial in modelling the fog, i.e. soil heat diffusivity, the CO2 concentration (representing clear‐sky longwave radiation), the vapour diffusion to droplets, and the turbulent mixing. Subsequently, we study whether these perturbations can improve the model representation, and on the other hand whether they can explain the model behaviour of the sixteen ensemble members. Results are displayed in process diagrams. We find that behaviour of the ensemble can be explained by a variations in the soil heat diffusivity and the turbulent mixing. However their sensitivities orient in approximately the same direction, and as such, errors in the formulation of the boundary‐layer scheme can be hidden by compensating errors in the land‐surface scheme. In addition, we find that simultaneous perturbations in the soil heat diffusivity and turbulent mixing do not result in the same results as superpositioning of the individual perturbations.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.