2024-03-29T07:47:42+01:00
https://library.wur.nl/oai
oai:library.wur.nl:wurpubs/508520
2024-03-09
edurep
openaire
public
Fraser, James A.
Diabaté, Moussa
Narmah, Woulay
Beavogui, Pépé
Guilavogui, Kaman
de Foresta, Hubert
Braga Junqueira, Andre
Article/Letter to editor
Ecology and Society 21 (2016) 3
ISSN: 1708-3087
Cultural valuation and biodiversity conservation in the Upper Guinea forest, West Africa
2016
The cultural valuation of biodiversity has taken on renewed importance over the last two decades as the ecosystem services framework has become widely adopted. Conservation initiatives increasingly use ecosystem service frameworks to render tropical forest landscapes and their peoples legible to market-oriented initiatives such as REDD+ and biodiversity offsetting schemes. Ecosystem service approaches have been widely criticized by scholars in the social sciences and humanities for their narrow focus on a small number of easily quantifiable and marketable services and a reductionist and sometimes simplistic approach to culture. We address the need to combine methods from each of the “three cultures” of natural science, quantitative social science, and qualitative social science/humanities in conceptualizing the relationship between cultural valuation and biodiversity conservation. We combine qualitative data with forest inventories and a quantitative index of cultural value to evaluate the relationship between cultural valuation and biodiversity conservation in Upper Guinea forest in Liberia, West Africa. Our study focuses on “sacred agroforests,” spaces that are associated with Mande macro-language speaking groups such as the Loma. We demonstrate that sacred agroforests are associated with different cultural values compared with secondary forests. Although biodiversity and biomass are similar, sacred agroforests exhibit a different species composition, especially of culturally salient species, increasing overall landscape agro-biodiversity. Sacred agroforests are also shaped and conserved by local cultural institutions revolving around ancestor worship, ritual, and the metaphysical conceptual category “salɛ.” We conclude that to understand the relationship between cultural valuation and biodiversity conservation, interpretivist approaches such as phenomenology should be employed alongside positivist ecosystem service frameworks.
en
application/pdf
https://research.wur.nl/en/publications/cultural-valuation-and-biodiversity-conservation-in-the-upper-gui
10.5751/ES-08738-210336
https://edepot.wur.nl/392995
Anthropogenic landscapes
Conservation science
Cultural heritage
Ecosystem services
Sacred forests
Secondary forests
Wageningen University & Research