Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 396706
Title Tailfin clipping, a painful procedure: Studies on Nile tilapia and common carp
Author(s) Roques, J.A.C.; Abbink, W.; Geurds, F.; Vis, J.W. van de; Flik, G.
Source Physiology and Behavior 101 (2010)4. - ISSN 0031-9384 - p. 533 - 540.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.08.001
Department(s) Aquaculture
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2010
Keyword(s) branchial chloride cells - fresh-water - oreochromis-niloticus - oncorhynchus-mykiss - cyprinus-carpio - rainbow-trout - na+/k+-atpase - fish - nociception - perception
Abstract The fish welfare debate is intensifying. Consequently, more research is carried out to further our knowledge on fish welfare in aquaculture. We define here a series of key parameters to substantiate an acute response to a supposedly painful stimulus: a standardized tailfin clip. Ultrastructural analysis of common carp (Cyprinus carpio) tailfin indicates the presence of A-d and C-type axons, which are typical for transmitting nociceptive signals in (higher) vertebrates. In Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus), responses to a tailfin clip were studied and the unavoidable acute stress associated with the handling required for this procedure. A series of key parameters for further studies was defined. The responses seen in ‘classical’ stress parameters (e.g., changes in plasma cortisol, glucose and lactate levels) did not allow discrimination between the clipping procedure and the handling stress. However, three parameters indicated a differential, stronger response to the clip stimulus itself: first, swimming activity increased more and clipped fish spent more time in the light (in a tank where half the volume is covered by dark material); second, the gill's mucus cells released their content as observed 1 h after the clip, and this response is transient (no longer observed at 6 h post clipping). Third, branchial Na+/K+-ATPase activity assayed in vitro was not affected by the procedures, but a remarkable migration of Na+/K+-ATPase immunoreactive (chloride) cells into the lamellar epithelium was observed as of 6 h post clipping. We conclude that the differential response to clipping supports that this is a painful procedure that evokes a transient specific physiological status.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.