Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 490601
Title Aanzuursystemen voor rundveedrijfmest in stallen
Author(s) Melse, R.W.; Starmans, D.A.J.; Ogink, N.W.M.
Source 17 : Wageningen UR Livestock Research (Livestock Research rapport 898) - 17
Department(s) Livestock & Environment
Publication type Research report
Publication year 2015
Keyword(s) rundveehouderij - rundveemest - aanzuren - ammoniakemissie - emissiereductie - luchtkwaliteit - mestvergisting - melkveehouderij - melkvee - zwavelzuur - cattle husbandry - cattle manure - acidulation - ammonia emission - emission reduction - air quality - manure fermentation - dairy farming - dairy cattle - sulfuric acid
Categories Animal Husbandry and Environment / Manure treatment
Abstract By acidification of liquid cattle manure in the pit underneath the floor, the emission of ammonia from an animal house can be reduced. Two systems for acidification can be distinguished: 1) Acidification with sulphuric acid; 2) Biological acidification, i.e. acid compounds are produced by bacteria in the manure. At the request of the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs in this report the main aspects of these systems are discussed. The analysis shows that the maximum achievable ammonia emission reduction is about 20%. Applied as a single low-emission measure in dairy barns, this reduction is not large enough to comply with the maximum levels that will come into effect from 2018, implying that this measure has to be combined with additional techniques, such as low-emission floor or air scrubbing techniques, and as such restricting perspectives for practical application. Furthermore, it is concluded that the sulphuric acid acidification system is ready for on-farm implementation, whereas the biological acidification system needs to be further developed. Acidification with sulphuric acid leads to a drastic increase of the sulphur content of the manure; attention must be paid to maximum sulphur application rates when this manure is applied to the soil; when this system is applied to the soil. The operating costs for biological acidification are about twice as much as for acidification with sulphuric acid. Besides, application of biological acidification might lead to a higher methane production. Because of the relatively high costs, it is uncertain whether biological acidification is feasible, even when it is ready for practical implementation. Therefore it is concluded that the biological acidification system is without prospects for the short term. The economic feasibility might improve when the increased methane production can be used in a digester. It is recommended to further study the feasibility of a combined system of biological acidification and manure digestion.
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.