Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 547298
Title Navigating pluralism : Understanding perceptions of the ecosystem services concept
Author(s) Ainscough, Jacob; Vries Lentsch, Aster de; Metzger, Marc; Rounsevell, Mark; Schröter, Matthias; Delbaere, Ben; Groot, Rudolf de; Staes, Jan
Source Ecosystem Services 36 (2019). - ISSN 2212-0416
DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.01.004
Department(s) Earth Observation and Environmental Informatics
WIMEK
Environmental Systems Analysis
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2019
Keyword(s) Boundary object - Ecosystem services - Guided pluralism - Science-policy interface - Sustainability
Abstract

Being open to multiple interpretations allows the ecosystem services concept to operate as a boundary object, facilitating communication and cooperation between different user groups. Yet there is a risk the resultant pluralism limits the capacity of ecosystem services assessments to directly inform decision and policy making, and that the concept could be used to support environmentally or socially harmful activities. Here, we report results from a large mixed methods survey conducted among academics, policymakers and practitioners working in the field of ecosystem services across Europe. We use these results to explore the trade-off that exists between the role of ecosystem services as a boundary object and the needs of policy and decision makers of more standardisation. We conclude this can be done by working towards the standardisation of ecosystem service assessments within specific jurisdictions, whilst maintaining forums for debate, collaboration, and critical reflection within the broader ecosystem services community. We also aim to deduce guiding principles to ensure the ecosystem services concept is not used to support detrimental activities. The consideration of shared and cultural values, the expansion of inter- and transdisciplinary work and the integration of the concept of sustainability are identified as valuable guiding principles to this end.

Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.