Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 547575
Title Development of possible alternative measures under the principle ‘appropriate behaviour’ in the Welfare Quality® broiler protocol
Author(s) Jong, I.C. de; Riel, J.W. van; Niekerk, T.G.C.M. van
Event Welfare Quality Seminar, Frederiksberg, 2018-12-11/2018-12-11
Department(s) Animal Health & Welfare
Publication type Abstract in scientific journal or proceedings
Publication year 2018
Abstract Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University and Research, The Netherlands
There is debate on the validity of behavioural measures within the Welfare Quality® broiler protocol. The Qualitative Behaviour Assessment (QBA) as a measure of ‘positive emotional state’ has not been validated for broilers, and assessors find it often difficult to assign descriptions of emotional states to broiler flocks. The touch test, assessing the ‘human-animal relationship’, turned out to be related to locomotion score. The aim of the current experiment was to (1) study whether simple behavioural measurements can be a suitable replacement of the QBA in the WQ broiler protocol, and (2) to study whether or not we could identify alternative measures of fear in broiler chickens. Here we report the results of (1) and the methods of (2). With respect to (1), four existing data sets of scan sampling of behaviour in commercial flocks (fast and slower growing broilers) were analysed to determine whether or not a reduced set of observations could be defined that would be predictive of flock behaviour. Behaviours (‘active’ (sum of different behaviours), foraging, dustbathing, comfort behaviour) were analysed as dependent variables in a logistic regression model with binomial distribution. Different models were used, taking into account effects of observer, location and time of the day, and separately the effect of number of scans. Results showed that ‘active’ composed of walking, standing and foraging, gave the smallest observer effect. Scan effects were found for all behaviours, except for ‘active’ composed of standing, walking and running. Large effects of location (wall and centre) and time of the day were found, suggesting that these should be taken into account. Dustbathing, comfort and foraging behaviour had low frequencies, large variation and needed higher number of scans and/or longer habituation for a reliable outcome. It is therefore questionable if these behaviours would be useful for inclusion in the WQ protocol.
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.