|Title||Consistency, inconsistency, and ambiguity of metabolite names in biochemical databases used for genome-scale metabolic modelling|
|Author(s)||Pham, Nhung; Heck, Ruben G.A. van; Dam, Jesse C.J. van; Schaap, Peter J.; Saccenti, Edoardo; Suarez-Diez, Maria|
|Source||Metabolites 9 (2019)2. - ISSN 2218-1989|
Systems and Synthetic Biology
|Publication type||Refereed Article in a scientific journal|
|Keyword(s)||Chemical nomenclature - Databases - GEM - GEM interoperability - Identifier multiplicity - Name ambiguity - Naming conventions - Standardization|
Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) are manually curated repositories describing the metabolic capabilities of an organism. GEMs have been successfully used in different research areas, ranging from systems medicine to biotechnology. However, the different naming conventions (namespaces) of databases used to build GEMs limit model reusability and prevent the integration of existing models. This problem is known in the GEM community, but its extent has not been analyzed in depth. In this study, we investigate the name ambiguity and the multiplicity of non-systematic identifiers and we highlight the (in)consistency in their use in 11 biochemical databases of biochemical reactions and the problems that arise when mapping between different namespaces and databases. We found that such inconsistencies can be as high as 83.1%, thus emphasizing the need for strategies to deal with these issues. Currently, manual verification of the mappings appears to be the only solution to remove inconsistencies when combining models. Finally, we discuss several possible approaches to facilitate (future) unambiguous mapping.