|Title||Healthy, but Disgusting: An Investigation Into Consumers' Willingness to Try Insect Meat|
|Author(s)||Poortvliet, M.; Pas, Lieke Van der; Mulder, Bob C.; Fogliano, Vincenzo|
|Source||Journal of Economic Entomology 112 (2019)3. - ISSN 0022-0493 - p. 1005 - 1010.|
Food Quality and Design
|Publication type||Refereed Article in a scientific journal|
|Keyword(s)||bovine meat - consumer decision-making - food choice motives - insect meat|
Consumption of insects has gained interest because it may provide a more sustainable and healthier alternative for conventional meat. However, in Western societies, insect consumption is met with resistance due to negative attitudes based on fear and disgust. To further understand consumers' willingness to try insect meat, a 2 (meat type: bovine vs. insect) × 2 (product type: common vs. uncommon) experiment was conducted (n = 130). Four food choice factors were expected to mediate the effect of meat type and product type on willingness to try: health, sensory appeal, risk perception, and disgust. Results indicate that meat type had no effect on willingness to try. Relative to bovine meat, insect meat was perceived as both healthier and more disgusting, which could explain the absence of a meat type effect. Unexpectedly, use of insects in common products (burgers) as compared to uncommon products (skewers) was met with a lower willingness to try. Also, common products with insect meat was considered to be less healthy and more disgusting, compared to uncommon products with insect meat.