Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 554216
Title An Average Consumer Concept of Bits and Pieces : Empirical Evidence on the Court of Justice of the European Union's Concept of the Average Consumer in the UCPD
Author(s) Schebesta, H.; Purnhagen, K.
Source In: The Transformation of Economic Law / de Almeida, Lucila, Cantero Gamito, Marta, Durovic, Mateja, Purnhagen, Kai, Hart Publishing - ISBN 9781509932580 - p. 13 - 27.
Department(s) Law and Governance
WASS
Publication type Peer reviewed book chapter
Publication year 2019
Abstract This article investigates the links of the average consumer concept in secondary legislation and the Court’s case law, using doctrinal and empirical methods. It addresses five research questions: How is the average consumer test conceptualised? How does the CJEU test the average consumer? How is the average consumer characterized? Who decides who the average consumer is (institutional dimension?) Is the ‘average consumer’ in the UCPD case law the same ‘average consumer’ as elsewhere? To answer these questions, we first illustrate the relationship of the average consumer benchmark in secondary legislation to the Court’s case law. We show that out of all secondary legislation which explicitly uses the “average consumer” in its wording, jurisprudence has only dealt with the UCPD. We acknowledge that a large bulk of jurisprudence concerns the average consumer test in primary law or has been applied to interpret secondary legislation which does not make explicit reference to the consumer benchmark. However, we limit our analysis to cases where this clear link between the wording of secondary law and the Court’s jurisprudence exists, leaving aside the cases where the CJEU interpreted secondary legislation in light of primary law or primary law directly. Consequently, we investigate only the cases where the Court has operationalised the “average consumer” benchmark of the UCPD. Lastly, we summarize and analyse our findings
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.