Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 560708
Title Meer met mate: co-creatie en leren
Author(s) Schönfeld, Kim von; Tan, W.G.Z.
Source In: Meer met meer: Bijdragen aan de Plandag 2019. - Groningen : Stichting Planologische Discussiedagen - ISBN 9789081921763 - p. 154 - 161.
Event Groningen : Stichting Planologische Discussiedagen - ISBN 9789081921763 Plandag 2019, Antwerp, 2019-05-23/2019-05-23
Department(s) Landscape Architecture and Spatial Planning
Land Use Planning
Publication type Contribution in proceedings
Publication year 2019
Keyword(s) citizen participation - urban planning - Social learning
Abstract In the context of 'more-with-more', citizens are often asked to do more: they have to participate more, do more themselves and take on more responsibility. At the same time, this also requires more administration and flexible working from the government.
This can result in a more involved attitude from both sides, and in building better-tuned results and knowledge. But this does not happen automatically, and we still too often start from the ideal of participation and co-creation, as a result of which we do not look sufficiently at which forms of this lead to which outcomes and consequences. Social learning is an analytical concept that can help with this: by looking better at how we gain knowledge and skills through interaction with others, we can get a better grip on which factors respond to each other in which way. This article introduces two cases from Groningen, the Netherlands, and discusses three main lessons that flow from this, regarding "desired" results; speed and efficiency; and personal backgrounds and timing of collaboration. The conclusion reflects on five concrete consequences that this has for planning practice.
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.