|Title||On the origin of the membrane potential arising across densely charged ion exchange membranes : How well does the teorell-meyer-sievers theory work?|
|Author(s)||Galama, A.H.; Post, J.W.; Hamelers, H.V.M.; Nikonenko, V.V.; Biesheuvel, P.M.|
|Source||Journal of Membrane Science & Research 2 (2016)3. - ISSN 2476-5406 - p. 128 - 140.|
Physical Chemistry and Soft Matter
|Publication type||Refereed Article in a scientific journal|
|Keyword(s)||Donnan equilibrium - Ion exchange membranes - Nernst-planck equation - Teorell-meyer-sievers (TMS) theory|
A difference in salt concentration in two solutions separated by a membrane leads to an electrical potential difference across the membrane, also without applied current. A literature study is presented on proposed theories for the origin of this membrane potential (Φm). The most well-known theoretical description is Teorell-Meyer-Sievers (TMS) theory, which we analyze and extend. Experimental data for Φm were obtained using a cation exchange membrane (CMX, Neosepta) and NaCl solutions (salt concentration from 1 mM to 5 M). Deviations between theory and experiments are observed, especially at larger salt concentration differences across the membrane. At a certain salt concentration ratio, a maximum in Φm is found, not predicted by the TMS theory. Before the maximum, TMS theory can be used as a good estimate of ?m though it overestimates the actual value. To improve the theory, various corrections to TMS theory were considered: A) Using ion activities instead of ionic concentration in the external solutions leads to an improved prediction; B) Inhomogeneous distribution of the membrane fixed charge has no effect on Φm; C) Consideration of stagnant diffusion layers on each side of the membrane can have a large effect on Φm; D) Reducing the average value of the fixed membrane charge density can also largely affect ?m; E) Allowing for water transport in the theory has a small effect; F) Considering differences in ionic mobility between co-ions and counterions in the membrane affects Φm significantly. Modifications C) and F) may help to explain the observed maximum in Φm.