Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 562080
Title Implementing the Landing Obligation. An Analysis of the Gap Between Fishers and Policy Makers in the Netherlands
Author(s) Kraan, Marloes; Verweij, Marieke
Source In: Collaborative Research in Fisheries / Holm, P., Hadjimichael, M., Linke, S., Mackinson, S., Springer (MARE Publication Series ) - ISBN 9783030267834 - p. 231 - 248.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1_14
Department(s) Environmental Policy
Onderz. Form. D.
Publication type Peer reviewed book chapter
Publication year 2020
Keyword(s) perceptions - landing obligation - discards - trust - collaborative research
Abstract The introduction of the landing obligation is a radical change of the European fisheries policy that has widened the gap between fishers and policy officers in the Netherlands. Especially the mixed demersal trawl fisheries have to adjust to this new measure, which requires a concerted effort between ministry, fleet and research institutions. This chapter describes the implementation process of the landing obligation in the Netherlands (between 2013–2015) and how it has been met with strong opposition by Dutch fishers. This chapter argues that such opposition stems not only from interests, but also from strongly held perceptions about the (ecological) consequences of the measure, as was clear from observing meetings and interviewing key actors. Although several meetings had been organised by the ministry to discuss the landing obligation with fishers, perception differences were not discussed explicitly. Discussions rather seemed to be parallel monologues where parties failed to meet a shared understanding. This situation jeopardises real cooperation in the preparation for full implementation of the landing obligation. The chapter ends with a discussion on possible ways to bridge the gap between fishers and policy officers
Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.