Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

Record number 562360
Title Does habit strength moderate the intention-behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? the case of fruit consumption
Author(s) Bruijn, Gert Jan De; Kremers, Stef P.J.; Vet, Emely De; Nooijer, Jascha De; Mechelen, Willem Van; Brug, Johannes
Source Psychology and Health 22 (2007)8. - ISSN 0887-0446 - p. 899 - 916.
DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320601176113
Publication type Refereed Article in a scientific journal
Publication year 2007
Keyword(s) Fruit consumption - Habit - Path analyses - SRHI - Theory of Planned Behaviour
Abstract

The present study examined if habit strength moderated the influence of intention on fruit consumption in a Dutch adult sample (N = 521, 46.3% males, mean age = 34.50, SD = 10.87), using the theoretical relations of the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). TPB variables and habit strength were assessed at baseline. Fruit consumption was assessed with a validated questionnaire five weeks later. Three groups were created: low habit strength (n = 180), medium habit strength (n = 185) and high habit strength (n = 156). Confirmatory factor analyses and multi-group path analyses were performed using AMOS 4.0. A good fit was obtained for the overall measurement model and the structural models. Multi-group path analyses showed that intention was a significant predictor of fruit consumption in the low habit ( = 0.36, p 0.001) and medium habit group ( = 0.30, p 0.001), but a non-significant predictor in the high habit group ( = 0.05, p = 0.596). Implications for information-based and motivation-based interventions are discussed.

Comments
There are no comments yet. You can post the first one!
Post a comment
 
Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.