Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

    Records 1 - 7 / 7

    • help
    • print

      Print search results

    • export

      Export search results

    Check title to add to marked list
    Transboundary water justice: a combined reading of literature on critical transboundary water interaction and "justice", for analysis and diplomacy
    Zeitoun, M. ; Warner, J.F. ; Mirumachi, N. ; Matthews, N. ; McLaughlin, K. - \ 2014
    Water Policy 16 (2014)S2. - ISSN 1366-7017 - p. 174 - 193.
    global environmental justice - hydro-hegemony - south-africa - nile basin - power - management - allocation - equity - law - hydrosolidarity
    By reviewing and blending two main bodies of research (critical transboundary water interaction analysis and centuries of thought on social justice) this paper seeks to improve international transboundary water interaction analysis and diplomacy. Various implications for transboundary analysis and diplomacy are grouped under themes of equitability, process/outcomes, and structural concerns. These include shortcomings of analysis and policy based on unfounded assumptions of equality, and options excluded from consideration by the legitimisation of particular concepts of justice over others. As power asymmetry is seen to enable or disable justice claims and conflict resolution efforts, the importance of ensuring equitable outcomes as a pre-condition for cooperation is asserted. Similarly, water conflict resolution is found to be more fair – procedurally – than is conflict management, and may be supported to a limited extent by international water law. A number of analytical tasks are suggested for future research and policy, including a call to scrutinise the source of legitimacy of strands of justice invoked. Given the very many perspectives on justice that exist in the network of relevant actors, potential bias in research and diplomacy could be reduced if all involved openly stated the morals underpinning their understanding of ‘justice’.
    How 'soft' power shapes transboundary water interaction
    Warner, J.F. ; Zeitoun, M. ; Mirumachi, N. - \ 2014
    In: Global Water : Issues and Insights / Grafton, Q., Wyrwoll, P., White, C., Allendes, D., Canberra : Australian National University Press - ISBN 9781925021660 - p. 51 - 56.
    Transboundary water interactions and the UN Watercourses Convention: Allocating water and implementing principles
    Mirumachi, N. ; Zeitoun, M. ; Warner, J.F. - \ 2013
    In: The UN Watercourses Convention in Force: Strengthening International Law for Transboundary Water management / Rocha Loures, F., Rieu-Clarke, A., New York : Earthscan - ISBN 9781849714464 - p. 352 - 364.
    How ‘soft’ power shapes transboundary water interaction
    Warner, J.F. ; Zeitoun, M. ; Mirumachi, N. - \ 2013
    Transboundary water interaction II: the influence of 'soft' power
    Zeitoun, M. ; Mirumachi, N. ; Warner, J.F. - \ 2011
    International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 11 (2011)2. - ISSN 1567-9764 - p. 159 - 178.
    hydro-hegemony - river-basin - cooperation - management - conflict - project - regime - peace
    This paper seeks to broaden the analysis of transboundary water interaction, by examining and interpreting the influence of ‘soft’ power therein. The ‘soft’ power of persuasion is understood to be exercised through discursive and to a lesser extent ideational means, and is interpreted in terms of compliance related to distributive (conflictual) or integrative (consensual) ends (after Scott (1994)). The focus is on inter-state water conflicts in hegemonic political contexts, where, it is found, the ‘first among equals’ has a greater ability to exploit ‘soft’ power and to determine the outcome. ‘Soft’ power is also seen to influence the choices states make or avoid in their transboundary water interaction, which explains in part how treaties intending to manage conflict may in fact delay or perpetuate it. For example, ‘soft’ power can be used by the basin hegemon to frame inequitable forms of cooperation in a cooperative light, such that unfair and ultimately unsustainable transboundary arrangements are replicated by the international donor community. Non-hegemonic riparian states also employ their capacity of ‘soft’ power, though may find themselves with little choice other than to comply with the arrangement established by the basin hegemon. The findings stress the importance of analysts questioning claims of interaction promoted as ‘cooperative’, and of examining the ‘soft’ power plays that underlie all transboundary water arrangements. Exemplification is provided through transboundary river basins and aquifers around the globe
    International relations theory and water do mix: A response to Furlong's troubled waters, hydro-hegemony and international water relations
    Warner, J.F. ; Zeitoun, M. - \ 2008
    Political Geography 27 (2008)7. - ISSN 0962-6298 - p. 802 - 810.
    virtual water - policy - power
    Hydro-hegemony : a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts
    Zeitoun, M. ; Warner, J.F. - \ 2006
    Water Policy 8 (2006)5. - ISSN 1366-7017 - p. 435 - 460.
    The increasing structural and physical scarcity of water across the globe calls for a deeper understanding of trans-boundary water conflicts. Conventional analysis tends to downplay the role that power asymmetry plays in creating and maintaining situations of water conflict that fall short of the violent form of war and to treat as unproblematic situations of cooperation occurring in an asymmetrical context. The conceptual Framework of Hydro-Hegemony presented herein attempts to give these two features ¿ power and varying intensities of conflict ¿ their respective place in the perennial and deeply political question: who gets how much water, how and why? Hydro-hegemony is hegemony at the river basin level, achieved through water resource control strategies such as resource capture, integration and containment. The strategies are executed through an array of tactics (e.g. coercion-pressure, treaties, knowledge construction, etc.) that are enabled by the exploitation of existing power asymmetries within a weak international institutional context. Political processes outside the water sector configure basin-wide hydro-political relations in a form ranging from the benefits derived from cooperation under hegemonic leadership to the inequitable aspects of domination. The outcome of the competition in terms of control over the resource is determined through the form of hydro-hegemony established, typically in favour of the most powerful actor.
    Check title to add to marked list

    Show 20 50 100 records per page

    Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.