Records 1 - 20 / 296
Effect verandering landgebruik op emissies broeikasgassen
Vellinga, T. ; Eekeren, N. van - \ 2017
V-focus 14 (2017)2. - ISSN 1574-1575 - p. 38 - 39.
landgebruik - bodemkwaliteit - broeikasgassen - emissie - melkveehouderij - graslanden - wisselbouw - grasklaver - land use - soil quality - greenhouse gases - emission - dairy farming - grasslands - ley farming - grass-clover swards
In het vorige nummer van V-focus is besproken wat het optimale landgebruik voor bodemkwaliteit is op melkveebedrijven met gras en mais, namelijk: 60% blijvend grasland met een lage frequentie van graslandvernieuwing en 20% grasklaver (rode en witte klaver) in rotatie met 20% bouwland. In het hetzelfde nummerwerd uitgerekend dat dit een gemiddeld melkveebedrijf 7.000 euro per jaar oplevert. In het Project Vruchtbare Kringloop Achterhoek en Liemers (VKA) is gekeken wat dit betekent voor de emissie van broeikasgassen. In de kennisgroep Melk&Klimaat van VKA werken melkveehouders, samen met FrieslandCampina, aan het verminderen van de ‘carbonfootprint’ van melk
Greenhouse gas reporting for the LULUCF sector in the Netherlands : methodological background, update 2016
Arets, E.J.M.M. ; Kolk, J.W.H. van der; Hengeveld, G.M. ; Lesschen, J.P. ; Kramer, H. ; Kuikman, P.J. ; Schelhaas, M.J. - \ 2017
Wageningen : Statutory Research Tasks Unit for Nature & the Environment (WOt-technical report 89) - 90
greenhouse gases - methodology - emission - netherlands - broeikasgassen - methodologie - emissie - nederland
This report provides a complete methodological description and background information of the DutchNational System for Greenhouse gas Reporting of the LULUCF sector. It provides detailed description of themethodologies, activity data and emission factors that were used. Additionally it gives a table-by-tableelaboration of the choices and motivations for filling the CRF tables for KP-LULUCF
Paprikateelt in de hooggeïsoleerde VenLow Energy kas
Zwart, H.F. de; Gelder, A. de; Hofland-Zijlstra, J. ; Noordam, M. - \ 2017
Bleiswijk : Wageningen University & Research, BU Glastuinbouw (Rapport GTB 1435) - 34
paprika's - capsicum annuum - kassen - kasgewassen - glasgroenten - glastuinbouw - energiebesparing - energiegebruik - isolatie (insulation) - broeikasgassen - kooldioxide - sweet peppers - capsicum annuum - greenhouses - greenhouse crops - greenhouse vegetables - greenhouse horticulture - energy saving - energy consumption - insulation - greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide
In order to realise a horticultural sector that operates without the combustion of fossil fuel, the first step is to reduce the demand for heating by improving the insultation of greenhouses. This holds especially for crops that are grown at high temperatures, like sweet pepper. The Venlow Energy greenhouse with its double glass cladding and energy screen is a good example of such a highly insulated greenhouse. This report presents the results of a one year cultivation and serves as a bench mark for the state of the art in energy conserving production of Sweet Pepper in the Netherlands. It shows the greenhouse climate conditions required, and the possibilities to meet these requirements with a low energy consumption and options to realise this from sustainable sources. The application of sustainable energy sources was not tested in practice, but since the exact resources (heat and CO2) required from hour to hour were measured, it is easy to do the math on the amounts and capacities needed. The application of pure CO2 or CO2 from another sustainable source is essential when aiming at a fossil energy free horticulture. Without external CO2 the production will drop substantially, especially because an energy conserving greenhouse has typically a strongly reduced air exchange. But, for the same reason, the amount of CO2 needed to increase the CO2 concentration is quite limited, 25 kg/m² per year in this experiment. With a production of 32.5 kg class I of red Sweet Pepper per m², the experiment has shown that halving the energy consumption compared to the general practice did’nt reduced the production.
Improving environmental sustainability of palm oil production in Thailand
Saswattecha, Kanokwam - \ 2017
Wageningen University. Promotor(en): Carolien Kroeze; Lars Hein. - Wageningen : Wageningen University - ISBN 9789463430401 - 277
palm oils - sustainability - environmental protection - environmental management - environmental impact - greenhouse gases - emission - thailand - palmoliën - duurzaamheid (sustainability) - milieubescherming - milieubeheer - milieueffect - broeikasgassen - emissie - thailand
Demand for palm oil in Thailand has increased as a result of Thai policies promoting the use of biodiesel. This increased demand results in negative effects on ecosystem services and increases environment pollution. Most existing studies focus on global warming impact alone, while other environmental impacts are being overlooked. Moreover, several mitigation options are widely studied but none of them has been investigated for cost-effectiveness. Such information is crucial for decision makers to explore possibilities for improving environmental performance towards sustainable palm oil production in Thailand. Therefore, this thesis aimed to analyse environmental impacts in the past and future, and to explore possibilities for improving environmental sustainability of the palm oil sector in Thailand. These objectives have been met through an integrated environmental assessment by coupling a landscape model and sectoral model which can be seen as the novelty of this thesis.
Methaanemissie uit mest : schatters voor biochemisch methaan potentieel (BMP) en methaanconversiefactor (MCF)
Groenestein, C.M. ; Mosquera, J. ; Melse, R.W. - \ 2016
Wageningen : Wageningen Livestock Research (Livestock Research rapport 961) - 28
mest - methaan - emissie - broeikasgassen - dierhouderij - manures - methane - emission - greenhouse gases - animal husbandry
This report presents the results of a desk study performed to determine and justify the use of new BMP and MCF values for cattle, pig and poultry manure under Dutch conditions.
Mestgassen uit melkveemest : jaarrond metingen van H2S-concentraties
Timmerman, M. - \ 2016
Wageningen : Wageningen Livestock Research (Livestock Research rapport 1002) - 26
dierlijke meststoffen - broeikasgassen - emissie - melkveehouderij - animal manures - greenhouse gases - emission - dairy farming
Methodologies identification and certification of Low ILUC risk biofuels : final report
Peters, Daan ; Spöttle, ; Hähl, Thomas ; Kühner, Ann-Kathrin ; Cuijpers, Maarten ; Stomph, Tjeerd Jan ; Werf, Wopke van der; Grass, Martin - \ 2016
Utrecht : ECOFYS Netherlands - 58
biofuels - greenhouse gases - land use - biomass - biomass production - biobased economy - indirect land use change - biobrandstoffen - broeikasgassen - landgebruik - biomassa - biomassa productie - biobased economy - indirecte veranderingen van landgebruik
Biofuels can be an important instrument to decarbonise the transport sector. However, the greenhouse gas performance of biofuels can be negatively impacted by Indirect land use change (ILUC) effects. In this report, Ecofys proposes two methodologies to identify and demonstrate low ILUC risk biofuel feedstock production through the application of yield increase (see Chapter 3) or unused land (see ILUC mitigation methodology for unused land).
Methodology for estimating emissions from agriculture in the Netherlands. : Calculations of CH4, NH3, N2O, NOx, PM10, PM2.5 and CO2 with the National Emission Model for Agriculture (NEMA)
Vonk, J. ; Bannink, A. ; Bruggen, C. van; Groenestein, C.M. ; Huijsmans, J.F.M. ; Kolk, J.W.H. van der; Luesink, H.H. ; Oude Voshaar, S.V. ; Sluis, S.M. ; Velthof, G.L. - \ 2016
Wageningen : Statutory Research Tasks Unit for Nature & the Environment (WOt-technical report 53) - 164
air pollutants, greenhouse gases, livestock, crops, animal housing, manure storage, manure application, inorganic fertilizer, enteric fermentation, manure management, agricultural soils, liming, NIR, CRF, IIR, NFR - landbouw - gewassen - landbouwgronden - vee - huisvesting, dieren - dierlijke meststoffen - rundveemest - mestverwerking - begrazing - broeikasgassen - luchtverontreinigende stoffen - emissie - ammoniakemissie - kooldioxide - methaan - anorganische meststoffen - fermentatie - bekalking - nederland - compost - rioolslib - teelt - oogstresten - rijp worden - agriculture - crops - agricultural soils - livestock - animal housing - animal manures - cattle manure - manure treatment - grazing - greenhouse gases - air pollutants - emission - ammonia emission - carbon dioxide - methane - inorganic fertilizers - fermentation - liming - netherlands - composts - sewage sludge - cultivation - crop residues - ripening
The National Emission Model for Agriculture (NEMA) is used to calculate emissions to air from agricultural activities in the Netherlands on a national scale. Emissions of ammonia (NH3) and other N-compounds (NOx and N2O) from animal housing, manure storage, manure application and grazing are assessed using a Total Ammoniacal Nitrogen (TAN) flow model. Furthermore, emissions from application of inorganic N-fertilizer, compost and sewage sludge, cultivation of organic soils, crop residues, and ripening of crops are calculated. NEMA is also used to estimate emissions of methane (CH4) from enteric fermentation and manure management, particulate matter (PM) from manure management and agricultural soils, and carbon dioxide
(CO2) from liming. Emissions are calculated in accordance with international guidance criteria and reported in an annual Informative Inventory Report (IIR; for air pollutants) and National Inventory Report (NIR; for greenhouse gases). This methodology report describes the outline and backgrounds of the emission
calculations with NEMA
Feed sources for livestock : recycling towards a green planet
Zanten, H.H.E. van - \ 2016
Wageningen University. Promotor(en): Imke de Boer, co-promotor(en): Paul Bikker; Bastiaan Meerburg. - Wageningen : Wageningen University - ISBN 9789462578050 - 251
cum laude - livestock - livestock feeding - feeds - resources - food wastes - leftovers - recycling - greenhouse gases - environmental impact - innovations - sustainable animal husbandry - animal production - vee - veevoeding - voer - hulpbronnen - voedselafval - etensresten - recycling - broeikasgassen - milieueffect - innovaties - duurzame veehouderij - dierlijke productie
Production of food has re-emerged at the top of the global political agenda, driven by two contemporary challenges: the challenge to produce enough nutritious food to feed a growing and more prosperous human population, and the challenge to produce this food in an environmentally sustainable way. Current levels of production of especially animal-source food (ASF), pose severe pressure on the environment via their emissions to air, water, and soil; and their use of scarce resources, such as land, water, and fossil energy. The livestock sector, for example, is responsible for about 15% of the global anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases and uses about 70% of global agricultural land.
Many proposed mitigation strategies to feed the world sustainably, therefore, focus primarily on reducing the environmental impact of the livestock sector, so-called production-side strategies. Other strategies focus on changing consumption patterns by reducing consumption of ASF, or on shifting from ASF with a higher environmental impact (e.g. beef) to ASF with a lower environmental impact (e.g. pork or chicken), so called consumption-side strategies.
Most of the environmental impact of production of ASF is related to production of feed. One production-side strategy to reduce the environmental impact is the use of products that humans cannot or do not want to eat, such as co-products, food-waste, and biomass from marginal lands for livestock feed (referred to as ‘leftover streams’ in this thesis). This strategy is effective, because feeding leftover streams to livestock transforms an inedible food stream into high-quality food products, such as meat, milk, and eggs.
Two production-side strategies that use leftover streams as livestock feed were explored in this thesis: replacing soybean meal (SBM) in diets of growing pigs with either rapeseed meal (RSM) or with waste-fed larvae meal. Replacing SBM with RSM in growing-pig diets was assessed because RSM became increasingly available following an increase in bio-energy production in the EU. In this strategy, therefore, the RSM content in pig diets increased at the expense of SBM. SBM is an ingredient associated with a high environmental impact. It was expected, therefore, that replacing SBM with RSM in pig diets would lead to a decrease in the environmental impact of pork production. Replacing SBM with waste-fed larvae meal was assessed because recent developments show the environmental benefits of rearing insects as livestock feed. Insects have a low feed conversion ratio (kg feed/kg product) and can be consumed completely, without residual materials, such as bones or feathers. The nutritional value of insects is high, especially as a protein source for livestock. Insect-based feed products, therefore, can replace conventional feed ingredients, such as SBM. Altogether this strategy suggests that waste-fed larvae meal might become an important alternative feed source in the future.
To gain insight into the status quo of the environmental impact of both mitigation strategies, replacing SBM with RSM or with waste-fed insects, we first used the attributional life cycle assessment (ALCA) method. Based on the ALCA method, results showed that each mitigation strategy was promising. Replacing SBM with RSM in growing pig diets hardly changed either global warming potential (GWP) or energy use (EU), but decreased land use (LU) up to 16% per kg body weight gain. As expected, feed production had the largest environmental impact, responsible for about 50% of the GWP, 60% of the EU, and 77% of the total LU. Feed production in combination with feed intake, were the most sensitive parameters; a small change in both these two parameters changed the results. Replacing SBM with waste-fed larvae meal in growing-pig diets showed that EU hardly changed, but GWP (29%) and LU (54%) decreased per kg body weight gain. Based on ALCA results, each mitigation strategy, therefore, seems to offer potential to reduce the environmental impact of pork production. An ALCA, however, has two disadvantages: it does not account for product-packages and it does not consider feed-food competition.
The first disadvantage of ALCA was that the complexity of dealing with product-packages is not fully considered. ‘Product-package’ refers to a multiple-output situation. During the processing of sugar beet, for example, beet-pulp and molasses are produced in addition to sugar. Sugar, beet-pulp, and molasses together form a ‘package of products’ because they cannot be produced independently from each other. An ALCA does not account for the fact that the production volume of the co-product(s) depends on the demand for the determining product (e.g. sugar), which results in the limited availability of co-products. Increasing the use of co-products in animal feed, consequently, results in reducing use of a co-product in another sector, requiring them to be replaced with a different product. The environmental impact of increasing the use of a co-product or food-waste, therefore, depends on the net environmental impact. The net environmental impact refers to the environmental benefits of using the product in its new application minus the environmental cost of replacing the product in its old application.
A consequential theoretical framework was developed to account for product-packages. The results, based on the consequential framework, contradicted standard ALCA results. The consequential LCA (CLCA) method we used for replacing SBM with RSM showed an increased GWP (up to 15%), EU (up to 12%), and LU (up to 10%) per kg body weight gain. Moreover, this CLCA method showed that replacing SBM with waste-fed larvae meal increased GWP (60%) and EU (90%), but decreased LU (73%) per kg body weight gain.
Accounting for product-packages increased the net environmental impact of each strategy, replacing SBM with RSM or with waste-fed larvae meal. The difference in results between ALCA and CLCA was especially large in the strategy with waste-fed larvae meal. The difference was caused mainly by the use of food-waste. Food-waste fed to larvae was used initially to produce bio-energy via anaerobic digestion. In CLCA, the environmental impact related to replacing the bio-energy function of food-waste with fossil-energy was included. The net environmental impact became negative, because environmental benefits of replacing SBM with waste-fed larvae meal were less than environmental costs related to the marginal energy source, i.e. fossil energy, replacing the bio-energy. Results of the indirect environmental impact, however, are situation specific: if the marginal energy source were wind or solar energy, the net environmental impact of using waste-fed larvae meal might be positive. Waste-fed larvae meal, therefore, appears to be an interesting mitigation strategy only when energy from wind and solar energy are used more dominantly than energy from fossil sources.
If results were based solely on ALCA, then these potentially negative impacts would have been overlooked. Consideration of the environmental consequences of product-packaging, therefore, is essential to determine total environmental costs. If policy makers or the feed industry want to assess the net environmental impact of a potential mitigation strategy, then we recommend to perform a CLCA instead of an ALCA. The framework developed in this thesis can be used to perform such an assessment.
The second disadvantage of an LCA was that it does not take into account feed-food competition, e.g. competition for land between humans and animals. Most LCA studies focus on the total amount of land required to produce one kg ASF. LCA studies do not account for competition for land between humans and animals, or so-called feed-food competition. In other words, they do not include, differences in the consumption of human-edible products by various livestock species or differences in the suitability of land used for feed production as land to cultivate food-crops directly. Given the global constraints on land, it is more efficient to grow food directly for human consumption rather than for livestock. To address the contribution of livestock to a future sustainable food supply, a measure for land use efficiency was developed, called the land use ratio (LUR). The LUR accounts for plant productivity, efficiency of converting human-inedible feed into ASF, and suitability of land for crop cultivation. The LUR also has a life-cycle perspective.
Results of the LUR illustrated that dairy cows on sandy soil, laying hens, and pig production systems in the Netherlands have a LUR >1.0. In terms of protein produced per m2, therefore, it is more efficient to use these soils for livestock production to produce crops for direct human consumption than to produce feed for livestock. Only dairy cows on peat soil produce human digestible protein (HDP) more efficiently than crops do, because peat is not suitable for crop production. The LUR allows identification of livestock production systems that are able to produce HDP more efficiently than crops do. Livestock systems with a LUR<1.0, such as dairy on peat, have an important role to play in future sustainable nutrition supply.
Results of the LUR showed that livestock production systems using mainly co-products, food-waste, and biomass from marginal land, can produce human digestible protein more efficiently than crop production systems do. The availability of those leftover streams, however, is limited and, therefore, the amount of ASF produced based only on leftover streams is also limited. Because LUR is a ratio, LUR results do not give an indication of how much ASF can be produced based on livestock systems that feed mainly on leftover streams.
The third, and last, mitigation strategy, therefore, focused on the amount of ASF that can be consumed by humans, when livestock are fed only on leftover steams, also referred to as “default livestock”. The calculation of the amount of ASF was based on the assumption that a vegan diet was consumed in principle. The resulting co-products and food-waste were fed to pigs and, biomass from grazing land was fed to ruminants. Results showed that in total 21 g animal source protein per person per day could be produced by feeding livestock entirely on leftovers.
Considering feed-food crops and feeding food-waste made an important contribution to the 21 g of protein that could be produced from default livestock. Considering feed-food crops implies that choices have to be made between different crops, based on their contribution to feed and food production. Oil production from soy cultivation, for example, resulted in the co-product SBM. Results showed that considering feed-food crops can affect the final protein production from pork. The practice of feeding food-waste to livestock is currently prohibited due to problems of food safety but the practice shows potential in extensively reducing the environmental impact of livestock production. Considering feed-food crops and feeding food-waste are examples of mitigation strategies that currently can be implemented to reduce further the environmental impact of the livestock sector.
On average, it is recommended to consume about 57 g of protein from ASF or plant-origin per person per day. Only ASF from default livestock does not fulfil the current global protein consumption of 32 g per person per day, but about one third of the protein each person needs can be produced without any competition for land between feed and food production. To feed the world more sustainably, by requiring livestock production systems with a LUR <1.0, however, a paradigm shift is needed. Global average consumption of ASF should decrease to about 21 g of protein per person per day. Innovations are needed, moreover, to overcome problems of food safety and technical concerns related to collecting the leftover streams. This applies, in particular to food-waste, which is currently unused in livestock production but which presents a valuable strategy in mitigating environmental impacts caused by livestock production. Livestock systems should change their focus, furthermore, from increasing productivity per animal towards increasing protein production for humans per ha. By using leftover streams optimally, the livestock sector is able to produce a crucial amount of protein, while still avoiding competition for land between feed and food crops. Livestock, therefore, can make an important contribution to the future nutrition supply.
An uncertain climate : the value of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in environmental impact assessment of food
Groen, E.A. - \ 2016
Wageningen University. Promotor(en): Imke de Boer, co-promotor(en): Eddy Bokkers; R. Heijungs. - Wageningen : Wageningen University - ISBN 9789462577558 - 239
environment - environmental impact - climatic change - uncertainty analysis - screening - sensitivity analysis - modeling - greenhouse gases - farms - dairy farms - food production - correlation analysis - milieu - milieueffect - klimaatverandering - onzekerheidsanalyse - screenen - gevoeligheidsanalyse - modelleren - broeikasgassen - landbouwbedrijven - melkveebedrijven - voedselproductie - correlatieanalyse
Production of food contributes to climate change and other forms of environmental impact. Input data used in environmental impact assessment models, such as life cycle assessment (LCA) and nutrient balance (NB) analysis, may vary due to seasonal changes, geographical conditions or socio-economic factors (i.e. natural variability). Moreover, input data may be uncertain, due to measurement errors and observational errors that exist around modelling of emissions and technical parameters (i.e. epistemic uncertainty). Although agricultural activities required for food production are prone to natural variability and epistemic uncertainty, very few case studies in LCA and NB analysis made a thorough examination of the effects of variability and uncertainty. This thesis aimed to enhance understanding the effects of variability and uncertainty on the results, by means of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Uncertainty analysis refers to the estimation of the uncertainty attribute of a model output using the uncertainty attributes of the model in- puts. There are three types of sensitivity analyses: (I) a local sensitivity analysis addresses what happens to the output when input parameters are changed, i.e. the intrinsic model behaviour of a parameter; (II) a screening analysis addresses what happens to the output based on the un- certainty range of the different input parameters; and (III) a global sensitivity analysis addresses how much the uncertainty around each input parameter contributes to the output variance. Both the screening analysis and the global sensitivity analysis combine the intrinsic model behaviour with the information of uncertainty around input parameters. Applying uncertainty analysis and sensitivity analysis can help to reduce the efforts for data collection, support the development of mitigation strategies and improve overall reliability, leading to more informed decision making in environmental impact assessment models. Including uncertainty in environmental impact assessment models showed that: (1) the type of uncertainty analysis or sensitivity analysis applied depends on the question to be addressed and the available information; (2) in some cases it is no longer possible to benchmark environmental performance if epistemic uncertainty is included; (3) including correlations between input parameters during uncertainty propagation will either increase or decrease output variance, which can be predicted beforehand; (4) under specific characteristics of the input parameters, ignoring correlation has a minimal effect on the model outcome. Systematically combining a local and global sensitivity analysis in environmental impact assessment models: (1) resulted in more parameters than found previously in similar studies (for the case studies discussed in this thesis); (2) allowed finding mitigation options, either based on innovations (derived from the local sensitivity analysis) or on management strategies (derived from the global sensitivity analysis); (3) showed for which parameters reliability should be improved by increasing data quality; (4) showed that reducing the (epistemic) uncertainty of the most important parameters can affect the comparison of the environmental performance.
Measurement methods to assess methane production of individual dairy cows in a barn
Wu, L. - \ 2016
Wageningen University. Promotor(en): Peter Groot Koerkamp, co-promotor(en): Nico Ogink. - Wageningen : Wageningen University - ISBN 9789462577312 - 190
dairy cows - cows - methane production - barns - measurement techniques - modeling - breath - uncertainty analysis - greenhouse gases - cubicles - melkkoeien - koeien - methaanproductie - landbouwschuren - meettechnieken - modelleren - adem - onzekerheidsanalyse - broeikasgassen - ligboxen
Mitigation of methane production from dairy cows is critical to reduce the dairy industry’s contribution to the production of greenhouse gases. None of current used methane measurement methods are flawless and application of the methods is limited to assess the effects of methane mitigation methods under practical conditions. The main objective of this thesis is to design, test, and validate methods to determine or rank the methane production of individual dairy cows at farm house level.
As a start, I evaluated merits and drawbacks of existing methane measurement methods and discussed against 14 requirements of methane measurement methods to assess methane mitigation strategies. This review study revealed that none of existing methods meet all requirements, and pointed out that sampling of breath air during the lying period of cows in cubicles could be a practical direction to measure methane production of individual cows under farm conditions. Therefore, we first assessed methane concentration levels and variations in time, and around cubicles, explored effects of barn and management factors on them, and assessed the effect of the variation of the background methane concentrations on assessing methane production of individual dairy cows in cubicles. Then, we designed and constructed an artificial reference cow (ARC) that mimics the methane production of real cows with known pre-set methane production rates and dynamics of eructations. With the acquired background information and the developed ARC, we assessed the uncertainty of a breath methane concentration (BMC) method in a feeder and developed a cubicle hood sampler (CHS) that measures methane fluxes from lying cows in cubicles. The observed uncertainty related to random errors of the BMC method can be overcome by sufficient numbers of repetitions. However identified uncertainty with a systematic nature, related to inconsistent relation between concentration and production rate, cannot be compensated by repeated measurements and requires further investigation into the widely used BMC method before it can be used with confidence. Compared to the BMC method, the developed CHS is not subject to such systematic effects and allows prolonged measurement periods. Performance test under field conditions showed that the designed CHS accurately measured methane fluxes provided by the ARC.
Overall, in this thesis I assessed the measurement error of current three methane measurement principles (flux, breath concentration & tracer gas), provided information to limit the measurement variation, and assessed the availability to determine or rank the methane production of individual dairy cows at farm house level. The newly developed ARC can be used as a known reference source to calibrate and develop practical methane measurement methods, and the CHS is sufficiently accurate to measure methane production of individual cows at farm house level.
Inpassen van maatregelen ter reductie van gasvormige emissies in de bedrijfsvoering van melkveebedrijven : Koeien & Kansen resultaten 2010-2013
Goselink, R.M.A. ; Sebek, L.B. ; Hilhorst, G.J. ; Evers, A.G. ; Haan, M.H.A. de - \ 2016
Wageningen : Wageningen UR Livestock Research (Rapport / Koeien & Kansen nr. 76) - 33
broeikasgassen - emissie - maatregelen - ammoniakemissie - emissiereductie - luchtkwaliteit - agrarische bedrijfsvoering - melkveebedrijven - duurzame veehouderij - melkveehouderij - greenhouse gases - emission - measures - ammonia emission - emission reduction - air quality - farm management - dairy farms - sustainable animal husbandry - dairy farming
In 2010 the dairy farmers of Cows & Opportunities have started working on a new project goal: gaseous emissions. To continue their role as pilot farm within the future developments in the dairy sector new goals have been added to their original goals on optimizing the nitrogen en phosphorus cycle: reducing greenhouse gas emissions and ammonia. The ultimate goal for 2013 was a 30% reduction of the average greenhouse gas emission of nitrous oxide (N2O) and methane (CH4) together, relative to the average Dutch dairy farm in 1990. In addition to the reduction of greenhouse gases, a second aim was to further reduce ammonia (NH3) emissions with 10% relative to the individual farm level in 2009. In 2009 the autonomously achieved reduction on greenhouse gas emissions turned out to be 29%, and this was further improved to 31% in 2013, reaching the project goal. This improvement was reached by both a reduction of N2O and CH4. The reduction of the N2O emission reached already 56% in 2009, but unexpectedly grew to 62% in 2013, partly by an increase in production intensity (kg FPCM per ha). The reduction of CH4 emission was less substantial, starting at 12% in 2009 and fluctuating around 13% in 2010-2013. The second aim was to further reduce NH3 emissions to an average of 3.2 kg NH3 per 1000 kg FPCM (10% reduction relative to the individual farm level in 2009). This was reached in 2013, showing that this goal was realistic even while working on other project goals like CH4 reduction in parallel. The decline in the NH3 emission is mainly achieved at the project farms situated on sandy soils and peat, while the emission of project farms on clay soils stayed relatively constant. Farm-specific circumstances such as the weather and roughage quality will influence the effect of measurements, thereby causing fluctuations in the emissions over the years. Working on the reduction of gaseous emissions is however possible on the average Dutch dairy farm and may lead to a reduction of 25% relative to 1990, looking at the autonomous reduction already reach in Cows & Opportunities in 2009. Further reduction of greenhouse gas emissions will cost more effort. If 50% of the Dutch dairy farmers also reaches a decrease in NH3 emission in 2020 comparable to the farmers in Cows & Opportunities have reached in 2013, the emission of the dairy sector wil be 3.6 kg NH3 per 1000 kg FPCM. Dairy farmers will however need high management skills, as they have to run a complex farming system and work simultaneously on a variety of financial, social and environmental objectives all-year.
Biofuel production in Vietnam : Greenhouse gas emissions and socioeconomic impacts
Thanh, L. le - \ 2016
Wageningen University. Promotor(en): Ekko van Ierland; Xueqin Zhu. - Wageningen : Wageningen University - ISBN 9789462576186 - 197
biofuels - greenhouse gases - environmental economics - emission - socioeconomics - fuels - natural resources - vietnam - biobrandstoffen - broeikasgassen - milieueconomie - emissie - sociale economie - brandstoffen - natuurlijke hulpbronnen - vietnam
The overall objective of this thesis is to study the energy efficiency, GHG emission savings, and the economic viability of biofuels as energy for transportation and to examine the impacts of biofuel policies on food production, welfare, and emission in Vietnam.
Sectorrapportage Duurzame Zuivelketen : prestaties 2014 in perspectief
Reijs, J.W. ; Doornewaard, G.J. ; Jager, J.H. ; Beldman, A.C.G. - \ 2015
Den Haag : LEI Wageningen UR (Report LEI 2015-126) - ISBN 9789086157273 - 161
dairy farming - dairy farms - milk production - agriculture and environment - emission reduction - greenhouse gases - sustainability - policy goals - monitoring - animal welfare - animal production - dairy cattle - animal health - animal housing - melkveehouderij - melkveebedrijven - melkproductie - landbouw en milieu - emissiereductie - broeikasgassen - duurzaamheid (sustainability) - beleidsdoelstellingen - monitoring - dierenwelzijn - dierlijke productie - melkvee - diergezondheid - huisvesting, dieren
Via het initiatief de Duurzame Zuivelketen streven zuivelondernemingen en melkveehouders gezamenlijk naar een toekomstbestendige en verantwoorde zuivelsector. De Duurzame Zuivelketen heeft doelen geformuleerd op 4 duurzaamheidsthema’s. Deze sectorrapportage doet verslag van de voortgang op deze doelen in 2014. Deze rapportage laat zien dat de Duurzame Zuivelketen sinds de nulmeting (2011) op het gebied van antibiotica, energie-efficiëntie en verantwoorde soja veel vooruitgang heeft geboekt en dat de doelen voor 2020 binnen handbereik zijn in 2014 of zelfs al gehaald. Ook bij levensduur en duurzame energie zijn er ontwikkelingen in de goede richting maar is er meer vooruitgang nodig om de doelen te kunnen halen. Op het gebied van broeikasgassen, fosfaat en ammoniak zorgt het toegenomen productievolume ervoor dat de afgesproken productieplafonds in gevaar komen. Op het thema weidegang is het vooralsnog niet gelukt om de ingezette dalende trend te keren. Voor dierenwelzijn en biodiversiteit is monitoring nog in ontwikkeling.
Greenhouse gas reporting for the LULUCF sector in the Netherlands : methodological background
Arets, E.J.M.M. ; Kolk, J.W.H. van der; Hengeveld, G.M. ; Lesschen, J.P. ; Kramer, H. ; Kuikman, P.J. ; Schelhaas, M. - \ 2015
Wageningen : Statutory Research Tasks Unit for Nature & the Environment (WOT Natuur & Milieu) (WOt-technical report 52) - 78
greenhouse gases - air pollutants - greenhouse effect - climatic change - emission - methodology - netherlands - broeikasgassen - luchtverontreinigende stoffen - broeikaseffect - klimaatverandering - emissie - methodologie - nederland
This report provides a complete methodological description of the Dutch National System for Greenhouse gas Reporting of the LULUCF sector for the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). The methodologies follow the IPCC 2006 guidelines for Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land-Uses (AFOLU).
Based on these guidelines, this report provides detailed descriptions and motivations of the used methods, activity data, and emission factors for calculation of the emissions and removals as reported in the National Inventory Report (NIR). The structure of the report follows the structure for national inventory reports as
laid out in the appendix to Decision 24/CP.19 of the UNFCCC.
Oogstmoment snijmais beïnvloedt methaanuitstoot : Later oogsten mais verlaagt methaanuitstoot zonder negatieve bijeffecten
Bannink, A. ; Hatew, B. ; Dijkstra, J. - \ 2015
Veeteelt 2015 (2015)Oktober. - ISSN 0168-7565 - p. 34 - 35.
landbouw en milieu - oogsttijdstip - droge stof - maïs - ruwvoer (forage) - methaan - emissiereductie - duurzame landbouw - broeikasgassen - agriculture and environment - harvesting date - dry matter - maize - forage - methane - emission reduction - sustainable agriculture - greenhouse gases
Wageningse diervoedingonderzoekers keken naar de gevolgen van het oogstmoment van mais op de methaanemissie. De conclusie is dat per procent drogestoftoename van snĳmais in maisrĳke rantsoenen de methaanvorming per kilogram meetmelk met 1,5 procent wordt verlaagd.
Minder gasvormige emissies op melkveebedrijf : praktijkervaringen met voer- en diermanagement als sturing voor methaan en ammoniak
Sebek, L.B. ; Goselink, R.M.A. ; Evers, A.G. ; Vrolijk, M. ; Haan, M.H.A. de - \ 2015
Wageningen : Wageningen UR Livestock Research (Rapport / Koeien & Kansen nr. 75) - 32
broeikasgassen - melkveehouderij - ammoniakemissie - emissie - reductie - methaan - greenhouse gases - dairy farming - ammonia emission - emission - reduction - methane
Dit rapport beschrijft wat het voor de melkveehouder betekent om reductiemaatregelen voor methaan in de bedrijfsvoering te implementeren. Het gaat om de beleving en de praktijkervaring van de 16 Koeien & Kansen deelnemers en hun bedrijfsadviseurs. De effectiviteit van de toegepaste maatregelen is in een ander Koeien & Kansen rapport beschreven (Goselink, 2015). De beschreven maatregelen zijn gericht op de reductie van de on farm emissie van het broeikasgas methaan in wisselwerking met de maatregelen om de emissie van ammoniak te verminderen. De bruikbaarheid voor de brede praktijk van de in Koeien & Kansen toegepaste reductiemaatregelen is onderzocht. Aangevuld met een omgevingsanalyse geeft dat een beeld van wat de Nederlandse melkveehouder nodig heeft om actief aan de slag te gaan met de reductie van de gasvormige emissies methaan en ammoniak.
Metingen aan een biofilter voor de behandeling van ventilatielucht van een vleesvarkensstal - locatie 2 = Measurements on a biofilter for treatment of exhaust air from a fattening pig house in the Netherlands
Melse, R.W. ; Hol, J.M.G. ; Ploegaert, J.P.M. ; Nijeboer, G.M. ; Hattum, T.G. van - \ 2015
Wageningen : Wageningen UR Livestock Research (Livestock Research report 896) - 35
ventilatie - biologische filtratie - varkensstallen - slachtdieren - luchtfilters - emissiereductie - luchtkwaliteit - ammoniak - stankemissie - fijn stof - broeikasgassen - ventilation - biological filtration - pig housing - meat animals - air filters - emission reduction - air quality - ammonia - odour emission - particulate matter - greenhouse gases
In this study the emission reduction of ammonia (NH3), odour, fine dust (PM10, PM2.5), and greenhouse gases (CO2, N2O, CH4) was determined for a biofilter (440 m2) treating exhaust air from a pig house (total ventilation capacity: 290.000 m3.uur-1). The average removal for ammonia, odour and fine dust (PM10) was 38%, 43%, and > 93%, respectively. For CO2, N2O, and CH4, no significant difference between inlet and outlet concentration was found for the biofilter.
Minder gasvormige emissies: onbekend maakt onbemind
Sebek, L.B. ; Goselink, R.M.A. - \ 2015
Nieuwsbrief Koeien & Kansen (2015)41. - p. 3 - 3ov.
melkveehouderij - broeikasgassen - emissiereductie - ammoniakemissie - methaan - dairy farming - greenhouse gases - emission reduction - ammonia emission - methane
Kosteneffectief sturen via voer- en diermanagement op minder methaan en ammoniak is goed mogelijk. Dat blijkt uit 4 jaar onderzoek in Koeien & Kansen. De Nederlandse praktijk hoort deze positieve boodschap echter (nog) niet. Er is weinig afiniteit met ‘gasvormige emissies’. Ammoniak heeft de aandacht dankzij Natura2000, NB-vergunningen en de PAS, maar broeikasgassen zijn voor het Nederlandse melkveebedrijf nog ‘ver van mijn bed’.
Nitraat voeren: methaan en N-kringloop
Sebek, L.B. - \ 2015
Nieuwsbrief Koeien & Kansen (2015)42. - p. 2 - 2.
nitraat - methaanremmers - agrarische bedrijfsvoering - innovatie adoptie - melkproductie - melkveehouderij - broeikasgassen - nitrate - methane inhibitors - farm management - innovation adoption - milk production - dairy farming - greenhouse gases
De Marke loopt voor met milieukundige innovaties. Het proefbedrijf implementeert bewezen innovaties om milieukundige winst te halen. Het voeren van nitraat is daarvan een voorbeeld. Daarmee wordt de grootste bron van broeikasgasemissie op het melkveebedrijf, methaan, flink verminderd.