Staff Publications

Staff Publications

  • external user (warningwarning)
  • Log in as
  • language uk
  • About

    'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research

    'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.

    Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.

    Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.

    We have a manual that explains all the features 

    Current refinement(s):

    Records 1 - 2 / 2

    • help
    • print

      Print search results

    • export

      Export search results

    Check title to add to marked list
    Review: Make ruminants green again - How can sustainable intensification and agroecology converge for a better future?
    Dumont, B. ; Groot, J.C.J. ; Tichit, M. - \ 2018
    Animal 12 (2018)s2. - ISSN 1751-7311 - p. s210 - s219.
    ecosystem services - efficiency - food systems - redesign - sustainability

    Livestock farming systems provide multiple benefits to humans: protein-rich diets that contribute to food security, employment and rural economies, capital stock and draught power in many developing countries and cultural landscape all around the world. Despite these positive contributions to society, livestock is also the centre of many controversies as regards to its environmental impacts, animal welfare and health outcomes related to excessive meat consumption. Here, we review the potentials of sustainable intensification (SI) and agroecology (AE) in the design of sustainable ruminant farming systems. We analyse the two frameworks in a historical perspective and show that they are underpinned by different values and worldviews about food consumption patterns, the role of technology and our relationship with nature. Proponents of SI see the increase in animal protein demand as inevitable and therefore aim at increasing production from existing farmland to limit further encroachment into remaining natural ecosystems. Sustainable intensification can thus be seen as an efficiency-oriented framework that benefits from all forms of technological development. Proponents of AE appear more open to dietary shifts towards less animal protein consumption to rebalance the whole food system. Agroecology promotes system redesign, benefits from functional diversity and aims at providing regulating and cultural services. We analyse the main criticisms of the two frameworks: Is SI sustainable? How much can AE contribute to feeding the world? Indeed, in SI, social justice has long lacked attention notably with respect to resource allocation within and between generations. It is only recently that some of its proponents have indicated that there is room to include more diversified systems and food-system transformation perspectives and to build socially fair governance systems. As no space is available for agricultural land expansion in many areas, agroecological approaches that emphasise the importance of local production should also focus more on yield increases from agricultural land. Our view is that new technologies and strict certifications offer opportunities for scaling-up agroecological systems. We stress that the key issue for making digital science part of the agroecological transition is that it remains at a low cost and is thus accessible to smallholder farmers. We conclude that SI and AE could converge for a better future by adopting transformative approaches in the search for ecologically benign, socially fair and economically viable ruminant farming systems.

    A framework for modelling business processes in demand-driven supply chains
    Verdouw, C.N. ; Beulens, A.J.M. ; Trienekens, J.H. ; Vorst, J.G.A.J. van der - \ 2011
    Production Planning & Control 22 (2011)4. - ISSN 0953-7287 - p. 365 - 388.
    operations management - information-systems - science research - design science - technology - organizations - opportunities - orientation - challenges - redesign
    Demand-driven supply chains are highly dynamic networks of different participants with different allocations of business processes and different modes of control and coordination. Companies must be able to take part in multiple supply chain configurations concurrently and to switch rapidly to new or adjusted configurations. This imposes stringent demands on information systems and requires a modelling approach that (1) combines high-level models for supply chain design with detailed models for engineering the accompanying information systems and (2) enables rapid instantiation of specific supply chain configurations from a repository of standard building blocks. This article designs a process modelling framework that enhances such an approach. Building on the terminology and process definitions provided by the Supply Chain Operations Reference model, it models supply chain configurations as specific sets of transformations, control systems and coordination mechanisms. The designed modelling framework is applied in a case study in the Dutch flower industry.
    Check title to add to marked list

    Show 20 50 100 records per page

     
    Please log in to use this service. Login as Wageningen University & Research user or guest user in upper right hand corner of this page.